R&D investments with competitive interactions

Review of Finance

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 355-401

  Miltersen, Kristian ^a   Schwartz, Eduardo ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044490875     PISSN: 15723097     EISSN: 1573692X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10679-004-2543-z     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Baldursson, F. M. (1998) Irreversible investment under uncertainty in oligopoly, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22, 627-644.
2. Bernardo, A. E. and Chowdhry, B. (2002) Resources, real options, and corporate strategy, Journal of Financial Economics 63, 211-234.
3. Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1986) A theory of exit in duopoly, Econometrica 54(4), 943-960.
4. Ghemawat, P. and Nalebuff, B. (1985) Exit, Rand Journal of Economics 16(2), 184-194.
5. Grenadier, S. R. (1999) Information revelation through option exercise, The Review of Financial Studies 12(1), 95-129.
6. Grenadier, S. R. (2002) Option exercise games: An application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms, The Review of Financial Studies 15(3), 691-721.
7. Grenadier, S. R. and Weiss, A. M. (1997) Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach, Journal of Financial Economics 44, 397-416.
8. Huisman, K. J. M. and Kort, P. M. (1999) Effects of strategic interactions on the option value of waiting, Working paper, Tilburg University.
9. Huisman, K. J. M., Thijssen, J. J. J., and Kort, P. M. (2001) Symmetric equilibrium strategies in game theoretical real option models, Working paper, Tilburg University.
10. Lambrecht, B. (2001) The impact of debt financing on entry and exit in a duopoly, The Review of Financial Studies 14(3), 765-804.
11. Lambrecht, B. and Perraudin, W. (2003) Real options and preemption under incomplete information, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27(4), 619-643.
12. Lee, T. and Wilde, L. (1980) Market structure and innovation: A reformulation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 94(2), 429-436.
13. Longstaff, F. A. and Schwartz, E. S. (2001) Valuing american options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach, The Review of Financial Studies 14(1), 113-147.
14. Pawlina, G. and Kort, P. M. (2001) Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: Who benefits from your competitive disadvantage?, Working paper 2001-95, Tilburg University
15. Pindyck, R. S. (1993) Investments of uncertain cost, Journal of Financial Economics 34, 53-76.
16. Schwartz, E. S. (2001) Patents and R&D as real options, Working paper #12-01, The John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA.
17. Schwartz, E. S. and Moon, M. (2000) Evaluating research and development investments, Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 85-106.
18. Smit, H. T. J. and Ankum, L. A. (1993) A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate investment strategy under competition, Financial Management 22(3), 241-250.
19. Williams, J. T. (1993) Equilibrium and options on real assets, The Review of Financial Studies 6(4), 825-850.