Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1704-1713

  Jacobsen, Thomas ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a   Winkler, István ^b   Horváth, János ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 24044484171     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589262     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aaltonen, O., Eerola, O., Hellstrom, Å., Uusipaikka, E., & Lang, A. H. (1997). Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1090-1106.
2. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of electrical and magnetic mismatch responses to changes in sounds. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38-51.
3. Atienza, M., & Cantero, J. L. (2001). Complex sound processing during human REM sleep by recovering information from long-term memory as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Brain Research, 901, 151-160.
4. Atienza, M., Cantero, J. L., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Posttraining sleep enhances automaticity in perceptual discrimination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 53-64.
5. Brattico, E., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2002). Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians: Evidence from ERP recordings. Music Perception, 19, 1-24.
6. Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351-353.
7. Cycowicz, Y. M., & Friedman, D. (1998). Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds. Brain and Cognition, 36, 30-51.
8. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport, 8, 919-924.
9. Diesch, E., Biermann, S., & Luce, T. (1998). The magnetic field elicited by word and phonological non-words. NeuroReport, 9, 455-460.
10. Huotilainen, M., Kujala, A., & Alku, P. (2001). Long-term memory traces facilitate short-term memory trace formation in audition in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 310, 133-136.
11. Jacobsen, T., Horvath, J., Schröger, E., Lattner, S., Widmann, A., & Winkler, I. (2004). Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain and Language, 88, 54-67.
12. Kraus, N., McGee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., & Sharma, A. (1995). Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear and Hearing, 16, 19-37.
13. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
14. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Näätänen, R. (2001). The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 38, 1-21.
16. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour-Luhtanen, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J., & Alho, K. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432-434.
17. Näätänen, R., Schröger, E., Karakas, S., Tervaniemi, M., & Paavilainen, P. (1993). Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. NeuroReport, 4, 503-506.
18. Näätänen, R., Terveniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 282-288.
19. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
20. Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., McGinnis, M., & Roberts, T. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: An MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1038-1055.
21. Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 111-139.
22. Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517-524.
23. Pulvermüller, F., Kujala, T., Shtyrov, Y., Simola, J., Tiitinen, H., Alku, P., Alho, K., Martinkauppi, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2001). Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage, 14, 607-616.
24. Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Wilson, S. M., Dronkers, N. F., & Bates, E. (2003). Neural resources for processing language and environmental sounds: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 126, 928-945.
25. Schröger, E. (1998). Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30, 131-145.
26. Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Huotilainen, M. (2004). Bottom-up and top-down flow of information within auditory memory: Electrophysiological evidence. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (2000). Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2697-2703.
28. Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2002a). Neurophysiological evidence of memory traces for words in the human brain. NeuroReport, 13, 521-525.
29. Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2002b). Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1085-1091.
30. Sussman, E., Sheridan, K., Kreuzer, J., & Winkler, I. (2003). Representation of the standard: Stimulus context effects on the process generating the mismatch negativity component of event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 40, 465-471.
31. Sussman, E., & Winkler, I. (2001). Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 431-439.
32. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Wang, W. J. (2003). MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology, 40, 430-435.
33. Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Alku, P., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Language context and phonetic change detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 833-844.
34. Winkler, I., Kujala, T., Tiitinen, H., Sivonen, P., Alku, P., Lehtokoski, A., Czigler, I., Csépe, V., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätä nen, R. (1999). Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology, 36, 638-642.
35. Winkler, I., Lehtokoski, A., Alku, P., Vainio, M., Czigler, I., Csepe, V., Aaltonen, O., Raimo, I., Alho, K., Lang, H., Iivonen, A., & Näätänen, R. (1999). Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 357-369.
36. Winkler, I., Schröger, E., & Cowan, N. (2001). The role of large-scale perceptual organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 59-71.
37. Winkler, I., Sussman, E., Tervaniemi, M., Ritter, W., Horváth J., & Näätänen, R. (2003). Preattentive auditory context effects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 57-77.
38. van Zuijen, T., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2004). Pre-attentive grouping of sequential sounds - An event-related potential study comparing musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 331-338.