Digit preference in Goldmann applanation tonometry: The Hedgehog effect

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 140, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 527-529

  Buller, A J ^a,b   Chatzinikolas, K ^a   Giannopoulos, N ^a   Nair, J ^a   Kelleher, S H ^a   Raj, S D ^a   Roy, K ^a   Naylor, G ^a  

^a BLACKPOOL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER ROYAL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL HOSPITAL; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 24044482991     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.046     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. S. Bennett Blood pressure measurement error its effect on cross-sectional and trend analyses J Clin Epidemiol 47 1994 293 301
2. P.A. Hessel Terminal digit preference in blood pressure measurements effects on epidemiological associations Int J Epidemiol 15 1986 122 125
3. D.G. Altman Practical statistics for medical research 1999 Chapman & Hall London 146 148
4. F.C. Hollows, P.A. Graham Intraocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population Br J Ophthalmol 50 1966 570 586
5. J.T. Gillow, R. Aggarwal Reducing bias during intraocular pressure measurement Br J Ophthalmol 7 1995 1057 1058