Bridging real world semantics to model world semantics for taxonomy based knowledge representation system

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 296-308

  Kwon, Ju Hum ^a   Song, Chee Yang ^a   Moon, Chang Joo ^b   Baik, Doo Kwon ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Context based similarity; Edge counting; Semantic coupling; Semantic similarity; Weighting attributes; WordNet

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WEBSITES;

CONTEXT BASED SIMILARITY; EDGE COUNTINGS; SEMANTIC COUPLINGS; WEIGHTING ATTRIBUTES; WORDNET;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 24044477901     PISSN: 10009000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-005-0296-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sheth A. Semantic issues in multidatabase systems. Special Issue of SIGMOD Record, December 1991, 20(4): 5-80.
2. Mena E, Illarramendi A, Kashyap V, Sheth A. OBSERVER: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-existing ontologies. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2000, 8(2): 223-271.
3. Arens Y, Knoblock C, Shen W. Query reformulation for dynamic information integration. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1996, 6(2): 99-130.
4. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The semantic web. Scientific American, May 2001.
5. Lee J H, Kim M H. Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in is-a hierarchies. Journal of Documentation, 1989, 49(2): 188-207.
6. Guarino N, Masolo C, Vetere C. OntoSeek: Content-based access to the web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999, 14(3): 70-80.
7. Voorhees E. Using WordNet for Text Retrieval. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Fellbaum C (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998, pp.285-303.
8. N Fridman Noy, M A Musen. PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proc. 17th Natl. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, July/August 2000.
9. Hans C. OntoMorph: A translation system for symbolic knowledge. In Proc. 7th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), Breckenridge, CO, USA, 2000, pp.471-482.
10. Mitra P, Wiederhold G, Kersten M. A graph-oriented model for articulation of ontology interdependencies. In Advances in Database Technology - EDBT, 2000.
11. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SO 32. ISO/IEC 11179: Information technology-metadata registries-part 1-6. ISO/IEC JTC 1, 2003.
12. Environmental Data Registry, http://www.epa.gov/edr/
13. U.S. Transportation, http://www.dot.gov/
14. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, http://www.aihw.gov.au/
15. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Rev., 1977, 84: 327-352.
16. McGill et al. An evaluation of factors affecting document ranking by information retrieval systems. Project report, Syracuse University School of Information Studies, 1979.
17. David D Lewis, Karen Spärck Jones. Natural language processing for information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 1996, 39(1): 92-101.
18. Resnik P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1999, 11.
19. Green S J. Building hypertext links by computing semantic similarity. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 1999, 11(5): 713-730.
20. Miller G A, Beckwith R, Fellbaum C, Gross D, Miller K. Five papers on WordNet. CSL Report 43, Princeton University, 1990, revised August 1993.
21. Miller G A. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 1995, 38(11).
22. Miller G. Nouns in WordNet. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Fellbaum C (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998, pp.23-46.
23. Finkelstein L, Gabrilovich E, Matias Y et al. Placing search in context: The concept revisited. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 2002, 20(1): 116-131.
24. Hideki Kozima, Akira Ito. Context-sensitive measurement of word distance by adaptive scaling of a semantic space. Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Selected Papers from RANLP'95, Vol. 136 of Amsterdam Sudies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Ruslan Mitkov, Nicolas Nicolov (eds.), Chapter 2, 1997, pp.111-124.
25. Formica A, Missikoff M. Concept similarity in SymOntos: An enterprise ontology management tool. The Computer Journal, 2002, 45(6): 583-594.
26. Lawrence S. Context in web search. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 2000, 23(3): 25-32.
27. Richardson R, Smeation A F, Murphy J. Using WordNet as a knowledge base for measuring semantic similarity between words. Technical Report CA-1294, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, 1994.
28. Hideki Kozima, Teiji Furugori. Similarity between words computed by spreading activation on English dictionary. In Proc. 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-93), Utrecht 1993, pp.232-239.
29. Jane Morris, Graeme Hirst. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics, 1991, 17(1): 21-48.
30. Manabu Okumura, Takeo Honda. Word sense disambiguation and text segmentation based on lexical cohesion. In Proc. the Fifteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94), 1994, 2: 755-761.
31. Lee J H, Kim M H, Lee Y J. Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in IS-A hierarchies. Journal of Documentation, 1993, 49(2): 188-207.
32. Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1989, 19(1): 17-30.
33. Resnik P. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity. In Proc. the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, August 1995, pp.448-453.
34. Budanitsky A. Lexical semantic relatedness and its application in natural language processing. Technical Report CSRG-390, Computer Systems Research Group, University of Toronto, August 1999.
35. Jiang J, Conrath D. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan, 1997.
36. Yuhua Li, Zuhair A Bandar, David McLean. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2003, 15(4): 871-882.
37. Sussna M. Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. In Proc. the Seoul International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM-93), Arlington, Virginia, 1993, pp.871-882.
38. Kasahara K, Matsuzawa K, Ishikawa T, Kawaoka T. Viewpoint-based measurement of semantic similarity between words. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Florida, USA, 1995, pp.56-63.
39. Kozima H, Ito A. A context-sensitive measurement of semantic word distance. Journal of Information Processing, 2001, 38: 86-92.
40. Medin D L, Goldstone R L, Gentner D. Respects for similarity. Psychological Rev., 1993, 100(2): 254-278.
41. Dekang Lin. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In Proc. 15th International Conf. Machine Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1998, pp.260-268.
42. Edwards A L. An Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1976.
43. Miller G, Charles W G. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Process, 1991, 6(1): 1-28.
44. Rubenstein H, Goodenough J B. Contextual correlates of synonymy. Comm. ACM, 1965, 8, pp.627-633.