Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: Institutional experience;Biopsia por aspiración con aguja fina en lesiones mamarias: Experiencia institucional

Revista de Investigacion Clinica

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 394-398

  Medina Franco, Heriberto ^a   Abarca Pérez, Leonardo ^a   Cortés González, Rubén ^a   Soto Germes, Santos ^b   Ulloa, José A ^a   Uribe, Norma ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y NUTRICIÓN SALVADOR ZUBIRÁN   (Mexico)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast lesions; Citology; Fine needle aspiration biopsy; Mammogram

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEXICO; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC DISEASES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREMENOPAUSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 24044476190     PISSN: 00348376     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Benjaporn C, Jongkolnee S, et al. Effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cytology of breast: análisis of 2,375 cases from Northern Thailand. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 201-5.
2. Martín HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg 1930; 92: 169-81.
3. Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, et al. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 18: 462-6.
4. Scopa CD, Kourkouras D, Tzoracoleftherakis E, Androulakis J. Diagnostic value of aspiration cytology in patients with breast lesions. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1990; 9: 47-51.
5. Nicosal S, Williams J, Horowits S, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast lesions. Review and statical analysis of 1,875 cases. Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 145-60.
6. O'Neil S, Castelli M, Gattuso P, Kluskens L, et al. Fine needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast lesions with histopathologic correlation. Surgery 1997; 122: 824-8.
7. Langmuir V, Cramer S, Hood M. Fine needle-aspiration cytology in correlation with clinical and mamographic findings. Acta Cytol 1989; 33: 93-8.
8. Kaufman Z, Shiptz B, Shapiro M, et al. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses combined physical examination, mammography and fine. Needle aspiration. J Surg Oncol 1994; 56: 254-7.
9. Negri S, Bonetti F, Capitano A, Bonzanini M. Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast lesions: comparision of specificity and sensitivity with clinical examination, mammography, echography, and thermography in 249 patients. Diagn Cythopath 1994; 11: 4-8.
10. Lieberman L, Menell J. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI.RADS). Rad Clin North Am 2002; 40: 3.
11. Palombini L, Fulciniti F, Ventrani A, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopses of breast masses. A critical analysis of 1,956 cases in 8 years (1974-1984). Cancer 1988; 61: 223-7.
12. Neil S, Castelli M, Gattuso P, et al. Diagnostic potential and pitfalls of ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for breast lesions. Surg Today 1998; 28: 172-6.
13. Scopa CD, Koukouras D, Spiliotis J, et al. Comparision of fine needle aspiration and Tru-cut biopsy of palpable mammary lesions. Cancer Detect Prevent 1996; 20: 620-4.
14. Kline TS. Adequacy and aspirates from the breast: a philosophical approach. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 473-85.
15. Clemons M, Goss P. Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 276-84.
16. Boerner S, Sneige N. Specimen adequacy and false-negative diagnosis rate in fine-needle aspirates of palpable breast masses. Cancer 1998; 84: 344-8.
17. O'Malley F, Casey TT, Winfield AC, Rodgers WH, Sawyer J, Page DL. Clinical correlates of false-negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1,005 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1993; 176: 360-4.
18. Layfield LJ, Mooney EE, Glasgow B, Hirchowitz S, Coogan A. What constitutes an adequate smear in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast? Cancer Cytophatol 1997; 81: 16-21.
19. Nicosai S, Williams J, Horowitz S, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast lesions. Review and statiscal analysis of 1,875 cases. Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 145-60.
20. Layfield L, Glasgow B, Cramer H. Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses. Pathol Annu 1989; 24(2): 23-62.
21. Park I, Ham E. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 1131-8.
22. Mitnick J, Gianutsos R, Pollak A, et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: sensivity of diagnostic techniques and correlation with histopathology. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 319-23.
23. Pisano E, Fajardo L, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. Cancer 1998; 82: 679-88.
24. Hayes MK, De Bruhl ND, Hirschowitz S, Kimme-Smith C, Basset LW. Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: reducing the rate of insufficient specimens. AJR 1996; 167: 381-4.
25. Ju C. Shin, Sneige. Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possile in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer 1998; 84: 186-91.
26. McKee G, Tambouret R, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathology 2001; 25: 73-7.
27. Jayaram G, Sthaneshwar P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumors. Diagn Cytopathology 2001; 26: 222-5.