Computation on sentence semantic distance for novelty detection

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 331-337

  Zhang, Hua Ping ^a,b   Sun, Jian ^a   Wang, Bing ^a   Bai, Shuo ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Categorization; Novelty detection; Sentence semantic distance

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CATEGORIZATION; NOVELTY DETECTION; SENTENCE SEMANTIC DISTANCE;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 24044473103     PISSN: 10009000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-005-0331-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ian Soboroff, Donna Harman. Overview of the TREC 2003 Novelty track. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.38.
2. Zhang M, Song R, Lin C et al. Expansion-based technologies in finding relevant and new information: THU TREC2002 novelty track experiments. In Proc. the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 19-22, 2002, p.591.
3. Christof Monz, Jaap Kamps, Maarten de Rijke. The University of Amsterdam at TREC2002. In Proc. the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 19-22, 2002, p.603.
4. Leah S, James Allen, Magaret E, Alvaro B, Courtey W. UMass at TREC2002: Cross language and novelty tracks. In Proc. the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 19-22, 2002, p.721.
5. Hong Qi, Jahna O, Dragomir R. The University of Michigan at TREC2002: Question answering and novelty tracks. In Proc. the Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 19-22, 2002, p.733.
6. Srikanth K, Yongmei S et al. UMBC at TREC12. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.699.
7. Ganesh R, Kedar B, Chirag Shah, Deepa P. Generic text summarization using Wordnet for novelty and hard. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.303.
8. Ryosuke Ohgaya, Akiyoshi Shimmura, Tomohiro Takagi. Meiji University Web and Novelty Track Experiments at TREC2003. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.399.
9. Jian Sun, Wenfeng Pan, Huaping Zhang. TREC2003 novelty and web track at ICT. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Nov. 18-21, 2003, p.138.
10. Taoufiq D, Josiane M. TREC novelty track at IRIT-SIG. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.337.
11. John M, Daniel M, Dianne P. From TREC to DUC to TREC again. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.293.
12. Ming-Feng Tsai, Wen-Juan Hou, Chun-Yuan Teng et al. Similarity computation in novelty detection and GeneRIF annotation. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.474.
13. Qianli Jin, Jun Zhao, Bo Xu. NLPR at TREC2003: Novelty and robust. In Proc. the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 18-21, 2003, p.126.
14. Church K W, Hanks P. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. In Proceedings the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL27, 1989, pp.76-83.
15. Grefenstette G. Use of syntactic context to produce term association lists for text retrieval. In Proceedings the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 21-24, 1992, pp.89-97.
16. George A Miller. WordNet 2.0. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/, 2003.
17. Sujian Li, Jian Zhang, Xiong Huang, Shuo Bai. Semantic computation in Chinese question-answering system. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2002, 17(6): 1-7.
18. Qun Liu, Sujian Li. Lexical semantic similarity computation based on HowNet. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, August 2002, 7(2): 59-76.
19. Jay J Jiang, David W Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. Int. Conf. Research on Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X), 1997.
20. Joachims T. Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, Schölkopf B, Burges C, Smola A (eds.), MIT-Press, 1999.