Midfacial and mandibular morphometry of children with Class II and Class III malocclusions

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 642-647

  Chang, H P ^a   Lin, H C ^b   Liu, P H ^c   Chang, C H ^c  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Class II malocclusion; Class III malocclusion; Geometric morphometry; Mandible; Midface; Procrustes analysis; Thin plate spline analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FACE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; PALATE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PALATE;

EID: 24044461763     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01489.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Graber TM. Incidence and recognition of malocclusion. In: Graber TM, ed. Orthodontics: principles and practice. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1972.
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Malocclusion and dentofacial deformity in contemporary society. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, eds. Contemporary orthodontics. 3rd edn. St Louis: Mosby; 2000.
3. Van Vuuren C. A review of the literature on the prevalence of class III malocclusion and mandibular prognathic growth hypotheses. Aust Orthod J. 1991;12:23-28.
4. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray L. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the Unite States. Estimated from the N-HANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97-106.
5. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:599-617.
6. Bookstein FL. On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:177-198.
7. McIntyre GT, Mossey PA. Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:231-242.
8. Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1989;11:567-585.
9. Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
10. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen and Unwin; 1940:122-132.
11. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
12. Liu PH. Biomechanical and biomorphic effects of orthopedic force on the mandible in class III malocclusion, Thesis. Tainan, Taiwan: National Cheng Kung University, Institute of Biomechanical Engineering, 2004.
13. Chang HP, Chuang MC, Yang YH, Liu PH, Chang CH, Cheng CF et al. Maxillofacial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate following secondary alveolar bone grafting: An interim evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;156:687-695.
14. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40-59.
15. Goodall CR. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J Royal Stat Soc. 1991;B53:285-339.
16. Rohlf FJ. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;111:463-478.
17. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:129-132.
18. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
19. Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Jele S. Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol. 1992;21:283-305.
20. Spalding PM. Treatment of class II malocclusions. In: Bishara SE, ed. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2001.
21. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1996.