Spatial yield risk across region, crop and aggregation method

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 53, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 103-115

  Popp, Michael ^a   Rudstrom, Margot ^b   Manning, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; LINUM USITATISSIMUM; SINAPIS ARVENSIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 24044461436     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bechtel, A. I. and D. L. Young. 1999. The importance of using farm level risk estimates in CRP enrollment decisions. Selected Paper at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings.
2. Carter, H. O. and G. W. Dean. 1960. Income, price, and yield variability for principal california crops and cropping systems. Hilgardia 30: 175-218.
3. Debrah, S. and H. H. Hall. 1989. Data aggregation and farm risk analysis. Agricultural Systems 31: 239-45.
4. Eisgruber, L. M. and L. S. Schuhman. 1963. The usefulness of aggregated data in the analysis of farm income variability and resource allocation. Journal of Farm Economics 45: 587-91.
5. Foltz, J. C., J. G. Lee, and M. A. Martin. 1993. Farm-level economic and environmental impacts of eastern corn belt cropping systems. Journal of Production Economics 6(2): 290-96.
6. Fulton, J. R., R. P. King, and P. L. Fackler. 1988. Combining farm and county data to construct farm level yield distributions. Staff Paper P88-20. University of Minnesota, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
7. Harwood, J., R. Heifner, K. Coble, J. Perry and A. Somwaru. 1999. Managing risk in farming: Concepts, research, and analysis. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 774.
8. Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wichern. 1998. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Englewoods Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Mapp, H. P. and K. J. Jeter. 1988. Potential impact of participation in commodity programs and Multiple Peril Crop Insurance on a southwestern Oklahoma farm. Multiple Peril Crop Insurance: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 334. Oklahoma State University.
10. Manitoba Crop Insurance Corporation. 1980-90. Unpublished field-level crop yield data, Risk Area 32. Portage la Prairie, Manitoba.
11. Marra M. C. and B. W. Schurle. 1994. Kansas wheat yield risk measures and aggregation: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 (1): 69-77.
12. Milligan, G. W. and M. C. Cooper. 1985. An Examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50: 159-79.
13. Popp, M. P., N. L. Dalsted and M. D. Skold. 1997. Multiple Peril Crop Insurance: An evaluation of crop insurance in northeastern Colorado. Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 19: 95-104.
14. Popp, M. and M. Rudstrom. 2000. Crop enterprise diversification and specialty crops. Agricultural Finance Review 60: 85-98.
15. Rudstrom, M., M. Popp, P. Manning and E. Gbur. 2002. Data Aggregation issues for crop yield risk analysis. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50: 185-200.
16. Statistics Canada. 2001. 2001 Census of Agriculture. Catalogue No. 95F0301XE. Ottawa, Ontario.
17. Taylor, M. L., R. M. Adams and S. F. Miller. 1992. Farm-Level response to agricultural effluent contral strategies: The Case of Willamette Valley. Journal of Resource Economics 17 (1): 173-83.
18. The Manitoba Co-operator. 2000. Yield Manitoba, Supplement to The Manitoba Co-operator. Winnipeg, Manitoba.
19. Wang, H. H. and H. Zhang. 2002. Model-based clustering for cross-sectional time series. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 7(1): 107-27.