From contexts to constructs: The use of grounded theory in operationalising contingent process models

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 2-14

  Galal, G H ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044457431     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000381     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boar BH (1984) Application Prototyping, a Requirements Definition Strategy for the 80’s. Wiley, New York.
2. Boehm B (1986) A spiral model for software development and enhancement. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 11(4), 14-24.
3. Boland RJJ (1985) Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research in information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, Proceedings of the IFIP Colloquim Manchester Business School, 1-3 September 1984 (Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G and Wood-Harper T, Eds), pp 193-201, IFIP.
4. Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-month, Essays on Software Engineering, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
5. Charmaz K (2000) Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (Denzin NK and Lincoln YS, Eds), pp 509-535, Sage, London.
6. Davis GB (1982) Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems Journal 21(1), 4-30.
7. Denzin NK (1994) The art and politics of interpretation. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (Denzin NK and Lincoln YS, Eds), pp 500-515, Sage, London.
8. Galal GH and Paul RJ (1999) A qualitative scenario approach to managing evolving requirements. Requirements Engineering Journal 4: 92-102.
9. Gilb T (1988) Principles of Software Engineering Management. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham.
10. Glaser BG and Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory-Strategies for Qualitative Research. Weidenfeld and Nic- olson, London.
11. Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, California.
12. Guba EG and Lincoln Y (1981) Effective Evaluation-Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive andNatu- ralistic Approaches. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
13. Guba EG and Lincoln Y (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
14. Hirschheim R and Klein HK. (1989) Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM 32(10), 1199-1216.
15. Iivari J (1988) Assessing IS design methodologies as methods of IS assessment. In Information Systems Assessment (Biorn-Andersen N and Davis GB, Eds), pp 59-80, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Iivari J (1991) A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development. European Journal of Information Systems 1(4), 249-272.
17. Jackson MC (1992) An integrated programme for critical thinking in information systems research. Journal of Information Systems 2, 83-95.
18. Jirotka M (1993) Requirements for technology in complex environments: tasks and interaction in a city dealing room. In Centre for Research into Innovation, Culture & Technology Seminar ‘Do Users Get What They Want?’ 2nd April 1993, Brunel University, Uxbridge. CRICT, UK.
19. McCracken DD and Jackson MA (1982) Life cycle concept considered harmful. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 7(2), 29-32.
20. Mingers J (1992) SSM and information systems: an overview. Systemist 14(3), 82-88.
21. Ngwenyama OK (1991) The critical theory approach to information systems: problems and challenges. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (Nissen H, Klien HK and Hirschheim R, Eds), pp 267-280, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
22. Patton MQ (1987) How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
23. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
24. Pidgeon N and Henwood K. (1997) Using grounded theory in psychological research. In Doing Qualitative Analysis in Psychology (Hayes N, Ed), Psychology Press, Sussex, Hove.
25. Pressman RG (2000) Software Engineering-A Practitioner’s Approach, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
26. Roman LG (1992). The political significance of other ways of narrating ethnography: a feminist materialist approach. In The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education (LeCompte MD, Millroy WL and Preissle J, Eds), pp 555-594, Academic Press, New York.
27. Rossi PH and Freeman HE (1993) Evaluation-A Systematic Approach, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
28. Royce WW (1970) Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In Proceedings of Western Electronic Show and Convention, pp A/1-1-A/1-9, WESECON Technical Papers, Los Angeles, CA.
29. Silverman D (1985) Qualitative Methodology & Sociology. Gower, Aldershot.
30. Sommerville I, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Bentley R, and Twidale M (1993) Integrating ethnography into the requirements engineering process. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering: RE '93 (Fickas S and Finkelstein A, Eds), pp 165-173, IEEE Computer Society Press, San Diego, CA.
31. Stake RE (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.
32. Strauss A and Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, California.
33. Strauss A and Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage, CA.
34. Walsham G (1995) The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6(4), 376-394.