Juvenile growth and palatability in co-occurring, congeneric British herbs

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1586-1589

  Kelly, Colleen K ^a,b   Hanley, Michael E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Differential sensitivity storage dynamics; Growth defense trade off; Herbivory; Juvenile palatability; Slugs; Species coexistence

Indexed keywords

ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE; COEXISTENCE; GROWTH; HERB; HERBIVORE; PALATABILITY; TRADE-OFF;

GASTROPODA;

EID: 23944524291     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.9.1586     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ARMSTRONG, D. P., AND M. WESTOBY. 1993. Seedlings from large seeds tolerate defoliation better: a test using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Ecology 74: 1092-1100.
2. BERENBAUM, M. 1981. Patterns of furanocoumarin distribution and insect herbivory in the Umbelliferae: plant chemistry and community structure. Ecology 62: 1254-1266.
3. BERGELSON, J., AND C. B. PURRINGTON. 1995. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. American Naturalist 148: 536-558.
4. BOWERS, M. D., AND N. E. STAMP. 1993. Effects of plant age, genotype and herbivory on Plantago performance and chemistry. Ecology 74: 1778-1791.
5. CHESSON, P. 2003. Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. Theoretical Population Biology 64: 345-357.
6. CHESSON, P. L., AND R. R. WARNER. 1981. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. American Naturalist 117: 923-943.
7. FENNER, M. 1987. Seedlings. In J. P. Grime, R. Hunt, G. A. F. Hendry, and D. H. Lewis [eds.], Frontiers of comparative plant ecology, 35-47. Academic Press, London, UK.
8. FENNER, M., M. E. HANLEY, AND R. LAWRENCE. 1999. Comparison of seedling and adult palatability in annual and perennial plants. Functional Ecology 13: 546-551.
9. HANLEY, M. E. 1998. Seedling herbivory, community composition and plant life-history traits. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1: 191-205.
10. HANLEY, M. E., AND B. B. LAMONT. 2001. Herbivory, serotiny and seedling defence in Western Australian Proteaceae. Oecologia 126: 409-417.
11. HANLEY, M. E., M. FENNER, AND P. J. EDWARDS. 1995. The effect of seedling age on the likelihood of herbivory by the slug Deroceras reticulation. Functional Ecology 9: 754-759.
12. HARBORNE, J. B. 1993. Introduction to ecological biochemistry, 4th ed. Academic Press, London, UK.
13. HARPER, J. L., P. H. LOVELL, AND K. G. MOORE. 1970. The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 327-356.
14. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. D. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. HERMS, D. A., AND W. J. MATTSON. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335.
16. KEARSLEY, M. J. C., AND T. G. WHITHAM. 1989. Developmental changes in resistance to herbivory: implications for individuals and populations. Ecology 70: 422-434.
17. KELLY, C. K. 1995. Seed size in tropical trees: a comparative study of factors affecting seed size in Peruvian angiosperms. Oecologia 102: 377-388.
18. KELLY, C. K. 1996. Seed size and habitat use: a reanalysis of Salisbury (1974). New Phytologist 135: 169-174.
19. KELLY, C. K. 1997. Response to Thompson and Hodkinson. New Phytologist 138: 167.
20. KELLY, C. K., AND A. PURVIS. 1993. Seed size and establishment conditions in tropical trees: on the use of taxonomic relatedness in determining ecological patterns. Oecologia 94: 356-360.
21. KELLY, C. K., AND M. G. BOWLER. 2002. Coexistence and relative abundance in forest tree species. Nature 417: 437-440.
22. KELLY, C. K., AND M. G. BOWLER. 2003. Communications arising (reply): Competition and coexistence in forest trees. Nature 422: 587.
23. KELLY, C. K., AND M. G. BOWLER. 2005. A new application of storage dynamics: differential sensitivity, diffuse competition and temporal niches. Ecology 86: 1012-1022.
24. KELLY, C. K., M. G. BOWLER, F. M. BREDEN, M. FENNER, AND G. M. POPPY. 2005. An analytical model assessing the potential threat to natural habitats from insect resistance transgenes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 272: in press.
25. KORICHEVA, J. 2002. Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant anitherbivore defenses. Ecology 83: 176-190.
26. PRICE, P. W. 1997. Insect ecology. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
27. SIEGEL, S., AND N. J. CASTELLAN JR. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
28. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. JAMES ROHLF. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
29. STAMP, N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 23-55.
30. SYMONDSON, W. O. C., D. M. GLEN, A. R. IVES, C. J. LANGDON, AND C. W. WILTSHIRE. 2002. Dynamics of the relationship between a generalist predator and slugs over five years. Ecology 83: 137-147.
31. THOMPSON, K., AND D. HODKINSON. 1998. Seed mass, habitat and life history: a reanalysis of Salisbury (1942, 1974). New Phytologist 138: 163-166.
32. WESTOBY, M. 2002. Choosing species to study. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 587.
33. WHELAN, R. J. 1982. An artificial medium for feeding choice experiments with slugs. Journal of Applied Ecology 19: 89-94.