Mean-field solution of the parity-conserving kinetic phase transition in one dimension

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 505-511

  Zhong, D ^a   Ben Avraham, D ^a   Munoz M A ^b  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

FINITE REACTION RATES; MEAN-FIELD SOLUTION; RANDOM WALK MODEL;

KINETIC THEORY;

EID: 23944520348     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2003-00303-4     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Percolation Structures and Processes, edited by G. Deutsher, R. Zallen, J. Adler, Annals of the Israel Physical Society, Vol. 5 (Hiler, Bristol, 1980)
2. E. Domany, W. Kinzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 311 (1984)
3. T.M. Ligget, Interacting Particle Systems (Springer Verlag, New York, 1985)
4. H. Hinrichsen, Adv. Phys. 49, 1 (2000);
5. G. Odor, cond-mat/0205644;
6. G. Grinstein, M.A. Muñoz, in Fourth Granada Lectures in Computational Physics, edited by P.L. Garrido, J. Marro, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 493 (Springer, Berlin 1997), p. 223
7. J. Marro, R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)
8. J. Kohler, D. ben-Avraham, J. Phys. A 24, L621 (1991);
9. D. ben-Avraham, J. Kohler, J. Stat. Phys. 65, 839 (1992);
10. M.A. Muñoz, G. Grinstein, R. Dickman, R. Livi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 451 (1996);
11. M.A. Muñoz, G. Grinstein, R. Dickman, J. Stat. Phys. 91, 541 (1998);
12. I. Jensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1465 (1993)
13. P. Grassberger, Z. Phys. B 47, 365 (1982);
14. H.K. Janssen, Z. Phys. B 42, 151 (1981)
15. H.D.I. Abarbanel, J.B. Bronzan, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2397 (1974)
16. 2-symmetry (at least in one dimension). Owing to this reason this class is usually (improperly) called conserved-parity [4]
17. P. Grassberger, F. Krause, T. von der Twer, J. Phys. A 17, L105 (1984);
18. P. Grassberger, J. Phys. A 22, L1103 (1989)
19. M.H. Kim, H. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2579 (1994);
20. H. Park, M.H. Kim, H. Park, Phys. Rev. E 52, 5664 (1995);
21. W. Hwang, S. Kwon, H. Park, H. Park, Phys. Rev. E 57, 6438 (1998)
22. N. Menyhard, J. Phys. 27, 6139 (1994)
23. N. Menyhárd, G. Odor, J. Phys. A 29, 7739 (1996)
24. K.S. Brown, K.E. Bassler, D.A. Browne, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3953 (1997);
25. K.E. Bassler, D.A. Browne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4094 (1996)
26. H. Hinrichsen, Phys. Rev. E 55, 219 (1997)
27. N. Inui, A.Y. Tretyakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5148 (1998)
28. H. Takayasu, A.Y. Tretyakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3060 (1992)
29. G. Szabo, M.A. Santos, Phys. Rev. E 59, R2509 (1999)
30. M. Bramson, L. Gray, Z. Warsch. Verw, Gebiete 68, 447 (1985)
31. T.M. Ligget, Interacting Particle Systems (Springer, New York, 1985)
32. I. Dornic, H. Chaté, J. Chave, H. Hinrichsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 045701 (2001)
33. I. Jensen, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3623 (1994)
34. J.L. Cardy, U.C. Täuber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4780 (1997);
35. J. Stat. Phys. 90, 1 (1998).
36. See also, U.C. Täuber, Acta Physica Slovaca 52, 505 (2002)
37. M.A. Muñoz, Bulletin of Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics (APCTP) 9-10, 5 (2002)
38. D. Zhong, D. ben-Avraham, Phys. Lett. A 209, 333 (1995)
39. D. ben-Avraham, S. Havlin, Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)
40. T. Masser, D. ben-Avraham, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066108 (2001)
41. T. Masser, D. ben-Avraham, Phys. Lett. A 275, 382-385 (2000);
42. Phys. Rev. E, 64, 062101 (2001)
43. S. Habib, K. Lindenberg, G. Lythe, C. Molina-París, J. Chem. Phys. 115,73 (2001)
44. D. ben-Avraham, M.A. Burschka, C.R. Doering, J. Stat. Phys. 60, 695 (1990)
45. M. Henkel, H. Hinrichsen, J. Phys. A34, 1561 (2001)
46. D. Zhong, D. ben-Avraham, J. Phys. A 28, 33 (1995);
47. D. ben-Avraham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3733 (1993);
48. E. Ben-Naim, P. Krapivsky, J. Phys. A 27, L481 (1994)
49. A. Sudbury, Ann. Probab. 18, 581 (1990);
50. H. Takayasu, N. Inui, J. Phys. A 25, L585 (1992)
51. A. Szolnoki (private communication) has performed a cluster mean field analysis of the present model, and observed that a phase transition is obtained considering clusters with at least four sites. He has gone up to 7-sites, and shown that the results improve very slowly upon enlarging cluster size
52. The same transition is observed whether one fixes r and treats Γ/Ω as a critical field, or whether one fixes Γ/Ω and takes r to be the critical field. Here we adopt the latter, with Γ/ Ω = 1
53. Observe that in this type of systems we do not have an exponential decay in the absorbing phase, but a power-law one, controlled asymptotically by the reaction A + A → 0
54. R. Dickman, M.A.F. de Menezes, Phys. Rev. E 66, 045101 (2002)