Reducing contralateral SI activity reveals hindlimb receptive fields in the SI forelimb-stump representation of neonatally amputated rats

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1727-1732

  Pluto, Charles P ^a,b   Chiaia, Nicolas L ^a   Rhoades, Robert W ^a   Lane, Richard D ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

^b Medical Collegeo of Ohio ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID A RECEPTOR; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID B RECEPTOR; LIDOCAINE;

AMPUTATION STUMP; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CALLOSUM; HINDLIMB; INTERNEURON; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE PROJECTION; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; RAT; RECEPTOR BLOCKING; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYNAPTIC INHIBITION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AFFERENT PATHWAYS; AMPUTATION STUMPS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BICUCULLINE; BRAIN MAPPING; DRUG INTERACTIONS; FORELIMB; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GABA ANTAGONISTS; LIDOCAINE; LOWER EXTREMITY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RATS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 23944516217     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00228.2005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Armstrong-James M and George MJ. Bilateral receptive fields of cells in rat Sml cortex. Exp Brain Res 70: 155-165, 1988.
2. Beierlein M, Gibson JR, and Connors BW. Two dynamically distinct inhibitory networks in layer 4 of the neocortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 2987-3000, 2003.
3. Calford MB. Dynamic representational plasticity in sensory cortex. Neuroscience 111; 709-738, 2002.
4. Carr DB and Sesack SR. Callosal terminals in the rat prefrontal cortex: synaptic targets and association with GABA-immunoreactive structures. Synapse 29: 193-205, 1998.
5. Chagnac-Amitai Y and Connors BW. Horizontal spread of synchronized activity in neocortex and its control by GABA-mediated inhibition. J Neurophysiol 61: 747-758, 1989.
6. Chowdhury SA and Rasmusson DD. Corticocortical inhibition of peripheral inputs within primary somatosensory cortex: the role of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. J Neurophysiol 90: 851-856, 2003.
7. Clarey JC, Tweedale R, and Calford MB. Interhemispheric modulation of somatosensory receptive fields: evidence for plasticity in primary somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 6: 196-206, 1996.
8. Dykes RW and Craig AD. Control of size and excitability of mechanosensory receptive fields in dorsal column nuclei by homolateral dorsal horn neurons. J Neurophysiol 80: 120-129, 1998.
9. Dykes RW, Landry P, Metherate R, and Hicks TP. Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 52: 1066-1093, 1984.
10. Fabri M and Manzoni T. Glutamic acid decarboxylase immunoreactivity in callosal projecting neurons of cat and rat somatic sensory areas. Neuroscience 123: 557-566, 2004.
11. Fish SE, Rhoades RW, Bennett-Clarke CA, Figley B, and Mooney RD. Organization, development and enucleation-induced alterations in the visual callosal projection of the hamster: single axon tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin and Di-I. Eur J Neurosci 3: 1255-1270, 1991.
12. Gonchar YA, Johnson PB, and Weinberg RJ. GABA-immunopositive neurons in rat neocortex with contralateral projections to S-I. Brain Res 697: 27-34, 1995.
13. Hayama T and Ogawa H. Regional differences of callosal connections in the granular zones of the primary somatosensory cortex in rats. Brain Res Bull 43: 341-347, 1997.
14. Innocenti GM, Frost DO, and Illes J. Maturation of visual callosal connections in visually deprived kittens: a challenging critical period. J Neurosci 5: 255-267, 1985.
15. Ivy GO and Killackey HP. Ontogenetic changes in the projections of neocortical neurons. J Neurosci 2: 735-743, 1982.
16. Kawaguchi Y. Receptor subtypes involved in callosally-induced postsynaptic potentials in rat frontal agranular cortex in vitro. Exp Brain Res 88: 33-40, 1992.
17. Keller A and White EL. Distribution of glutamic acid decarboxylase- immunoreactive structures in the barrel region of mouse somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Lett 66: 245-250, 1986.
18. Keller A and White EL. Synaptic organization of GABAergic neurons in the mouse Sml cortex. J Comp Neurol 262: 1-12, 1987.
19. Koppel H and Innocenti GM. Is there a genuine exuberancy of callosal projections in development? A quantitative electron microscopic study in the cat. Neurosci Lett 41: 33-40, 1983.
20. Koralek KA and Killackey HP. Callosal projections in rat somatosensory cortex are altered by early removal of afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 1396-1400, 1990.
21. Lane RD, Bennett-Clarke CA, Chiaia NL, Killackey HP, and Rhoades RW. Lesion-induced reorganization in the brainstem is not completely expressed in somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 4264-4268, 1995.
22. Lane RD, Killackey HP, and Rhoades RW. Blockade of GABAergic inhibition reveals reordered cortical somatotopic maps in rats that sustained neonatal forelimb removal. J Neurophysiol 11: 2723-2735, 1997.
23. Lane RD, Stojic RS, Killackey HP, and Rhoades RW. Source of inappropriate receptive fields in cortical somatotopic maps from rats that sustained neonatal forelimb removal. J Neurophysiol 81: 625-633, 1999.
24. Lent R, Hedin-Pereira C, Menezes JR, and Jhaveri S. Neurogenesis and development of callosal and intracortical connections in the hamster. Neuroscience 38: 21-37, 1990.
25. Markram H, Toledo-Rodriguez M, Wang Y, Gupta A, Silberberg G, and Wu C. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 793-807, 2004.
26. McBain CJ and Fisahn A. Interneurons unbound. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 11-23, 2001.
27. McCasland JS, Hibbard LS, Rhoades RW, and Woolsey TA. Activation of a wide-spread network of inhibitory neurons in barrel cortex. Somatosens Mot Res 14: 138-147, 1997.
28. A receptor-mediated inhibition. J Physiol 562: 37-46, 2005.
29. Olavarria J, Van Sluyters RC, and Killackey HP. Evidence for the complementary organization of callosal and thalamic connections within rat somatosensory cortex. Brain Res 291: 364-368, 1984.
30. Pidoux B and Verley R. Projections on the cortical somatic I barrel subfield from ipsilateral vibrissae in adult rodents. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 46: 715-726, 1979.
31. Pluto CP, Lane RD, and Rhoades RW. Local GABA receptor blockade reveals hindlimb responses in the SI forelimb-stump representation of neonatally amputated rats. J Neurophysiol 92: 372-379, 2004.
32. Porter JT, Johnson CK, and Agmon A. Diverse types of interneurons generate thalamus-evoked feedforward inhibition in the mouse barrel cortex. J Neurosci 21: 2699-2710, 2001.
33. Rerun V and Ebner FF. Lesions of mature barrel field cortex interfere with sensory processing and plasticity in connected areas of the contralateral hemisphere. J Neurosci 23: 10378-10387, 2003.
34. Remple MS, Jain N, Diener PS, and Kaas JH. Bilateral effects of spinal overhemisections on the development of the somatosensory system in rats. J Comp Neurol 475: 604-619, 2004.
35. Reyes A, Lujan R, Rozov A, Burnashev N, Somogyi P, and Sakmann B. Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits. Nat Neurosci 1: 279-285, 1998.
36. Rhoades RW and Dellacroce DD. Neonatal enucleation induces an asymmetric pattern of visual callosal connections in hamsters. Brain Res 202: 189-195, 1980.
37. Rhoades RW, Fish SE, Mooney RD, and Chiaia NL. Distribution of visual callosal projection neurons in hamsters subjected to transection of the optic radiations on the day of birth. Brain Res 429: 217-232, 1987.
38. Shuler MG, Krupa DJ, and Nicolelis MA. Bilateral integration of whisker information in the primary somatosensory cortex of rats. J Neurosci 21: 5251-5261, 2001.
39. Sillito AM, Kemp JA, and Blakemore C. The role of GABAergic inhibition in the cortical effects of monocular deprivation. Nature 291: 318-320, 1981.
40. Somogyi P, Kisvarday ZF, Martin KA, and Whitteridge D. Synaptic connections of morphologically identified and physiologically characterized large basket cells in the striate cortex of cat. Neuroscience 10: 261-294, 1983.
41. Staiger JF, Zilles K, and Freund TF. Distribution of GABAergic elements postsynaptic to ventroposteromedial thalamic projections in layer IV of rat barrel cortex. Eur J Neurosci 8: 2273-2285, 1996.
42. Stojic AS, Lane RD, Killackey HP, and Rhoades RW. Suppression of hindlimb inputs to S-I forelimb-stump representation of rats with neonatal forelimb removal: GABA receptor blockade and single-cell responses. J Neurophysiol 83: 3377-3387, 2000.
43. Stojic AS, Lane RD, and Rhoades RW. Intracortical pathway involving dysgranular cortex conveys hindlimb inputs to S-I forelimb-stump representation of neonatally amputated rats. J Neurophysiol 85: 407-413, 2001.
44. Swadlow HA. Influence of VPM afferents on putative inhibitory interneurons in S1 of the awake rabbit: evidence from cross-correlation, microstimulation, and latencies to peripheral sensory stimulation. J Neurophysiol 73: 1584-1599, 1995.
45. Swadlow HA. Fast-spike interneurons and feedforward inhibition in awake sensory neocortex. Cereb Cortex 13: 25-32, 2003.
46. Swadlow HA, Beloozerova IN, and Sirota MG. Sharp, local synchrony among putative feed-forward inhibitory interneurons of rabbit somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 79: 567-582, 1998.
47. Tamas G, Lorincz A, Simon A, and Szabadics J. Identified sources and targets of slow inhibition in the neocortex. Science 299: 1902-1905, 2003.
48. Vogt BA and German AL. Responses of cortical neurons to stimulation of corpus callosum in vitro. J Neurophysiol 48: 1257-1273, 1982.
49. Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Kaelin-Lang A, Boroojerdi B, and Cohen LG. Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere. Brain 125: 1402-1413, 2002.
50. Wiest MC, Bentley N, and Nicolelis MA. Heterogeneous integration of bilateral whisker signals by neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake rats. J Neurophysiol Nov 24 [Epub ahead of print], 2004.
51. Wong-Riley M, Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstratable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Brain Res 160: 134-138, 1979.