Landowner satisfaction with the wetlands reserve program in Wisconsin

Environmental Management

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 248-257

  Forshay, Kenneth J ^a   Morzaria Luna, Hem Nalini ^a,b   Hale, Brack ^a,c   Predick, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Centro Intercultural de Estudios de Desiertos y Océanos A C Edif Agustín Cortes   (Mexico)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation easement; Federal program; Invasive species; Monitoring; Restoration; Wetland

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COSTS; DATA REDUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PLANTS (BOTANY); RESTORATION;

ECOLOGICAL MONITORING; LANDOWNERS; RESTORATION SITES; WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAMS (WRP);

ECOLOGY;

LANDOWNER; MONITORING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEER; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXPERIMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; GRASS; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MANAGER; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONNEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SATISFACTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TAX; UNITED STATES; WETLAND;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PLANTS; PUBLIC OPINION; RECREATION; WISCONSIN;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WISCONSIN; WORLD;

CERVIDAE;

EID: 23944507745     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0093-y     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Boldt, R, 2002. Impact of use valuation on agricultural land values and property taxes. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Division of Research and Policy, Madison. Available at http://www.dor.state.wi.us/ra/agipro02.pdf.
2. Cammack, S., and E. Van De Genachte. 2002. General tax incentives. In Georgia Natural Heritage Program. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, Atlanta Georgia.
3. Carey, M., R. Heimlich, and R. Brazee. 1990. Permanent wetland reserve: Analysis of a new approach to wetland protection. Report USDA/AIB-610. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
4. Cole, C. A 2002. The assessment of herbaceous cover in wetlands as an indicator of function. Ecological Indicators 2:287-293.
5. Dahl, T. E 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
6. Department of Justice Canada R.S.C. 1985. Chapter 1 (5th Suppl.).
7. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 375 pp.
8. Heimlich, R., and R. Claassen. 1998. Agricultural conservation policy at the crossroads. Agricultural and Resource Economic Review 27:95-107.
9. Heimlich, R.E., M. B. Carey, and R. J. Brazee. 1989. Beyond Swampbuster A Permanent wetland reserve. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44:445-450.
10. Jaccard, J. 2001. Multicategory models: Interaction effects in logistic regression. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.
11. Kanagy, C.L., C. R. Humphrey, and G. Firebaugh. 1994. Surging environmentalism - changing public opinion or changing publics. Social Science Quarterly 75:804-819.
12. Kentula, M. E 2000. Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 15:199-209.
13. Kitchen, A. 2002. Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program: Monitoring report for Wisconsin (1987-1999). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Madison.
14. Lant, C., and S. E. Kraft. 1993. Evaluation of policy tools to establish forests and protect water quality in cornbelt watersheds. Report No. UILUWRC93217, USGSG201706.
15. Martin, L. 1965. The physical geography of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison 608.
16. Maurer, D. A., R. Lindig-Cisneros K. J. Werner, S. Kercher, R. C. Miller, and B. Zedler. 2003. The replacement of wetland vegetation by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Ecological Restoration 21:116-119.
17. Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics 35:25-33.
18. Mitsch, W. J., and R. F. Wilson. 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications 6:77-83.
19. Nielsen, E. G., and L. K. Lee. 1987. The magnitude and costs of groundwater contamination from agricultural chemicals: A national perspective. Staff Report AGES70318. Economic Research SVC, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
20. Nowak, P., and M. Schepf. 1987. Implications of the Conservation Reserve provisions of the 1985 Farm Bill: A survey of the county-level USDA personnel. Journal of Soil & Watery Conservation 42:285 .
21. NRCS 2002. Wetlands Reserve Program manual. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/frambill/ 2002/products.html.
22. NRCS. 2003. 2002 Wetlands Reserve Program: Wisconsin summary. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, Madison.
23. NRCS Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses. 2001. Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press Washington, DC.
24. Office of the Governor, 2003. 2003-2005 ewxecutive budget. State of Wisconsin, Division of Executive Budget and Finance Department of Administration, Madison. Available at: http://www.wisgov.state.wi.us/budget.asp.
25. Parks, P. J., and R. A. Kramer. 1995. A policy simulation of the Wetlands Reserve Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28:223-240.
26. Poe, G. L. 1998. Property tax distortions and participation in federal easement programs: An exploratory analysis of the Wetlands Reserve Program. Agricultural and Resource Economic Review 27:117-124.
27. Rispoli, D., and C. Hambler. 1999. Attitudes to wetland restoration in Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire, UK. International Journal of Science Educational 21:467-484.
28. Simenstad, C. A., and R. M. Thom. 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications 6:38-56.
29. Sokal, R., and J. F. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: The principal and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York, 887 pp.
30. Srutek, M. 1997. Growth responses of Urtica dioica L. to different water table depth. Plant Ecology 133:163-169.
31. Thom, R. M. 2000. Adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects. Ecological Engineering 15:365-372.
32. Walters, C. 2001. Adaptive management of renewable resources. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, New Jersey , 374 pp.
33. Whigham, D. F 1999. Ecological issues related to wetland preservation, restoration, creation, and assessment. Science of the Total Environment 240:31-40.
34. WRP. 2002. Restoring America's wetlands. 06/02MT, Wetlands Reserve Program. USDA, Washington, DC.
35. Zedler, J. B., and J. C. Callaway. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories?. Restoration Ecology 7:69-73.
36. Zedler, J. B., and J. C. Callaway. 2000. Evaluating the progress of engineered tidal wetlands. Ecological Engineering 15:211-215.