Worst case scenario analysis for elliptic problems with uncertainty

Numerische Mathematik

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 185-219

  Babuska I ^a   Nobile, F ^b   Tempone, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944504284     PISSN: 0029599X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-005-0601-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Guide for Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid dynamics simulation. Technical Report AIAA G-077-1998, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998
2. Ainsworth, M., Oden, J-T.: A posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis. Wiley, 2000
3. Babuška, I., Chleboun, J.: Effects of uncertainties in the domain on the solution of Neumann boundary value problems in two spatial dimensions. Math. Comp. 71(240), 1339-1370 (electronic) (2002)
4. Babuška, I., Chleboun, J.: Effects of uncertainties in the domain on the solution of Dirichlet boundary value problems. Numer. Math. 93(4), 583-610 (2003)
5. Babuška, I., Oden, J.T.: Verification and validation in computational engineering and science. Part I: Basic concepts. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193, 4057-4066 (2004)
6. Babuška, I., Stroboulis, T.: The Finite Element Method and its Reliability. Oxford Sci. Publ., 2001
7. Bangerth, W., Rannacher, R.: Adaptive finite element methods for differential equations. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2003
8. Ben-Haim, Y.: Information-gap decision theory. Series on Decision and Risk. Academic Press Inc., San Diego CA, 2001. Decisions under severe uncertainty
9. Ben-Haim, Y., Elishakoff, I.: Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990
10. Brenner, S.C., Scott, L.R.: The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer-Verlag, 1994
11. Brezis, H.: Analyse fonctionnelle: Théorie et applications. Collection Mathématiques Appliquées pour la Maîtrise. Masson, Paris, 1983
12. Cacuci, D.: Sensitivity and Uncertainty analysis: theory. Volume 1. Chapman & Hall 2003
13. Achenbach, J., Hlaváček, I., Chleboun, J., Babuška, I.: Uncertain input data problems and the worst scenario method. Elsevier, 2004
14. National Research Council. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press, 1994
15. Cullen, A.C., Frey. H.Ch.: Probabilistic Techniques Exposure Assessment. Plenum Press, 1999
16. Elishakoff, I.: Probabilistic Methods in the Theory of Structures. Dover, Second edition, 1999
17. Elishakoff, I. (ed.): Whys and hows in uncertainty modelling. Springer-Verlag, 1999
18. Evans, L.: Partial Differential Equations. Volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. AMS, 1998
19. Garreau, S., Guillaume, P., Masmoudi, M.: The topological asymptotic for PDE systems: the elasticity case. SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (6):1756-1778 (electronic), 2001.
20. Helton, J.C.: Analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainties. J. Stochastical Computations and Simulations 57, 3-76 (1997)
21. Helton, J.C.: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in performance assessment for waste isolation Plant. Comput. Phys. Commun. 117, 156-180 (1999)
22. Machiels, L., Maday, Y., Patera, A.T.: A "flux-free" nodal Neumann subproblem approach to output bounds for partial differential equations. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 330(3), 249-254 (2000)
23. Melchers, R.E.: Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. Wiley, 1999
24. Modarres, M., What Every Engineer Should know about Reliability and Risk Analysis. Dekker, 1993
25. Moon, K.-S., Von Schwerin, E., Szepessy, A., Tempone, R.: Convergence Rates for an adaptive dual weighted residual finite element algorithm. ICES Report 04-19, ICES University of Texas at Austin, April 2004
26. Oberkampf, W.L., Trucano, T.G.: Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 38, 209-272 (2002)
27. Oberkampf, W.L., Trucano, T.G., Hirsch, Ch.: Verification, validation and predictive capabilities in computational engineering and physics. SANDIA Report SAND2003-3769, Sandia National Laboratories, 2003
28. Oden, J.T., Prudhomme, S.: Goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method. Comput. Math. Appl. 41(5-6), 735-756 (2001)
29. Oden, J.T., Prudhomme, S.: Estimation of modeling error in computational mechanics. J. Comput. Phys. 182, 496-515 (2002)
30. Oden, J.T., Prudhomme, S., Hammerand, D.C., Kuczma, M.S.: Modeling error and adaptivity in nonlinear continuum mechanics. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190, 6663-6684 (2001)
31. Pironneau, O.: Optimal shape design for elliptic systems. Springer Series in Computational Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984
32. Ramsey, Ch.B., Modarres, M.: Commercial Nuclear Power. Assuring Safety for the Future. Wiley, 1997
33. Roache, P.J.: Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers, 1998
34. Spanos, P.D., Deodatis, D. (eds.): Computational Stochastic Mechanics. Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Mechanics, Corfu Greece June 9-12, 2002. Millpress, 2003
35. Szabó, B., Babuška, I.: Finite element analysis. Wiley, New York, 1991