Generalized stationary points and an interior-point method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints

Mathematical Programming

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 231-261

  Liu, Xinwei ^a   Sun, Jie ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Global convergence; Interior point methods; Mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints; Stationary point

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

GLOBAL CONVERGENCE; INTERIOR-POINT METHODS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING WITH EQUILIBRIUM CONSTRAINTS (MPEC); STATIONARY POINT;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 23944502258     PISSN: 00255610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-004-0543-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Aiyoshi, E., Shimizu, K.: Hierarchical decentralized systems and its new solution by a barrier method. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., SMC 11, 444-449 (1981)
2. Anandalingam, G., Friesz, T.L., eds.: Hierarchical Optimization. Ann. Oper. Res., 1992
3. Bard, J.F.: Convex two-level optimization. Math. Program. 40, 15-27 (1988)
4. Ben-Ayed, O., Blait, C.E.: Computational difficulties of bilevel linear programming. Oper. Res. 38, 556-559 (1990)
5. Benson, H.Y., Sen, A., Shanno, D.F., Vanderbei, R.J.: Interior-point algorithms, penalty methods and equilibrium problems. Technical Report ORFE-03-02, Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, 2003
6. Benson, H.Y., Shanno, D.F., Vanderbei, R.J.: Interior-point methods for nonconvex nonlinear programming: complementarity constraints. Research report ORFE-02-02, Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, 2002
7. Byrd, R.H., Hribar, M.E., Nocedal, J.: An interior-point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. SIAM J. Optim. 9, 877-900 (1999)
8. Chen, Y., Florian, M.: The nonlinear bilevel programming problem: Formulations, regularity and optimality conditions. Optim. 32, 193-209 (1995)
9. Clark, P.A., Westerberg, A.W.: A note on the optimality conditions for the bilevel programming problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 35, 413-4-18 (1988)
10. DeMiguel, A.V., Friedlander, M.P., Nogales, F.J., Scholtes, S.: An interior point method for mpecs. Technical Report, London Business School, 2003
11. Dirkse, S.P., Ferris, M.C., Meeraus, A.: Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: Automatic reformulation and solution via constraint optimization. Tech. Report NA-02/11, Oxford University Computing Lab, 2002
12. Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program., Ser. A 91, 201-213 (2002)
13. Facchinei, F., Jiang, H.Y., Qi, L.: A smoothing method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Math. Program. 85, 107-134 (1999)
14. Falk, J.E., Liu, J.: On bilevel programming, part I: general nonlinear cases. Math. Program. 70, 47-72 (1995)
15. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S.: Numerical experience with solving MPECs by nonlinear programming methods. Numerical Analysis Report NA/YYY, Dept. of Math., Univ. of Dundee, UK, 2001
16. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S., Ralph, D., Scholtes, S.: Local convergence of SQP methods for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Numerical Analysis Report NA/209, Dept. of Math., Univ. of Dundee, UK, 2002
17. Fourer, R., Gay, D.M., Kernighan, B.W.: AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming. Second Edition, THOMSON, Brooks/cole, 2003
18. Fukushima, M., Luo, Z.-Q., Pang, J.-S.: A globally convergent sequential quadratic programming algorithm for mathematical programs with linear complementarity constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 10, 5-34 (1998)
19. Fukushima, M., Pang, J.-S.: Some feasibility issues in mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 8, 673-681 (1998)
20. Fukushima, M., Pang, J.-S.: Convergence of a smoothing continuation method for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. In: Ill-posed Variational Problems and Regularization Techniques, M. Theŕa, R. Tichatschke, (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999, pp. 99-110
21. Fukushima, M., Tseng, P.: An implementable active-set algorithm for computing a B-stationary point of a mathematical program with linear complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 724-739 (2002)
22. Gay, D.M.: Hooking your solver to AMPL. Preprint, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, 2000
23. Gay, D.M., Overton, M.L., Wright, M.H.: A Primal-Dual interior method for nonconvex nonlinear programming. Advances in nonlinear programming: Proceedings of the 96 International conference on nonlinear programming, Y. Yuan, (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998
24. Gould, N.I.M., Orban, D., Sartenaer, A., Toint, Ph.L.: Superlinear convergence of primal-dual interior-point algorithms for nonlinear programming. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 974-1002 (2001)
25. Harker, P.T., Pang, J.-S.: On the existence of optimal solutions to mathematical program with equilibrium constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. 7, 61-64 (1988)
26. Harker, P.T., Pang, J.-S.: Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math. Program., Ser. B 48, 161-220 ( 1990)
27. Huang, J., Pang, J.-S.: A mathematical programming with equilibrium constraints approach to the implied volatility surface of American options. Research Report, The Johns Hopkins Univ., 2001
28. Jiang, H. Y., Ralph, D.: Smooth SQP methods for mathematical programs with nonlinear complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 10, 779-808 (2000)
29. Leyffer, S.: The penalty interior point method fails to converge for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Numerical analysis report NA/208, Department of Math., University of Dundee, 2002
30. Leyffer, S.: MacMPEC - www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/leyffer/MacMPEC/. 2002
31. Leyffer, S.: Complementarity constraint as nonlinear equation: Theory and numerical experience. Preprint, MCS Division, Argonne National Lab, 2003
32. Liu, X.-W., Sun, J.: A robust primal-dual interior point algorithm for nonlinear programs. Accepted for publication in SIAM J. Optim.
33. Liu, X.-W., Sun, J.: Global convergence analysis of line search interior point methods for nonlinear programming without regularity assumptions. Accepted for publication in J. Optim. Theory Appl.
34. Liu, X.-W., Yuan, Y.-X.: A robust algorithm for optimization with general equality and inequality constraints. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 517-534 (2000)
35. Luo, Z.-Q., Pang, J.-S., Ralph, D.: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, 1996
36. Marcotte, P.: Network design problem with congestion effects: A case of bilevel programming. Math. Program. 34, 142-162 (1986)
37. Outrata, J.V.: On optimization problems with variational inequality constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 4, 340-357 (1994)
38. Outrata, J.V., Zowe, J.: A numerical approach to optimization problems with variational inequality constraints. Math. Program. 68, 105-130 (1995)
39. Pang, J.-S., Fukushima, M.: Complementarity constraint qualifications and simplified B-stationarity conditions for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 13, 111-136 (1999)
40. Raghunathan, A.U., Biegler, L.T.: An interior point method for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. Technical Report, Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003
41. Scholtes, S.: Convergence properties of a regularization scheme for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 11, 918-936 (2001)
42. Scholtes, S., Scheel, H.: Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints: Stationarity, optimality, and sensitivity. Math. Oper. Res. 25, 1-22 (2000)
43. Scholtes, S., Stöhr, M.: Exact penalization of mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 37, 617-652 (1999)
44. Scholtes, S., Stöhr, M.: How stringent is the linear independence assumption for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. Math. Oper. Res. 26, 851-863 (2001)
45. Vicente, L.N., Calamai, P.: Bilevel and multilevel programming: A bibliography review. J. Global Optim. 5, 291-306 (1994)