Investigation of compensation source, trait empathy, satisfaction with outcome and forgiveness in the criminal context

Australian Psychologist

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 63-69

  Ristovski, Adela ^a   Wertheim, Eleanor H ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944499872     PISSN: 00050067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00050060512331317157     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19-44.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
4. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
5. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
6. DeCarufel, A. (1981). Victims' satisfaction with compensation: Effects of initial disadvantage and third party intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 445-459.
7. Emmons, R. A. (2000). Personality and forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness; Theory, research, and practice (pp. 156-175). New York: Guildford Press.
8. Enright, R. D. and the Human Development Study Group (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. M. Kurtines, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 123-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Fattah, E. (1997). Toward a victim policy aimed at healing, not suffering. In R. Davis (Ed.), Victims of crime (2nd ed., pp. 246-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 103-131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hope, D. (1987). The healing paradox of forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 24, 240-244.
12. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp.220-266). New York: Academic Press.
13. Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1-37.
14. McCullough, M. E. (1997). Marital forgiveness: Theoretical foundations and an approach to prevention. Marriage and Family: A Christian Journal, 1, 81-96.
15. McCulloughj M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194-197.
16. McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M. McCullough, K. Pargament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness theory, research, and practice (pp. 65-88). New York: Guilford.
17. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-14). New York: Guilford.
18. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
19. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
20. Ostrihanska, Z., & Wojcik, D. (1993). Burglaries as seen by the victims. International Review of Victimology, 2, 217-225.
21. Peachey, D.E. (1989). What people want from mediation. In K. Kressel, & D. G. Pruitt (Eds.)3 Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third-party intervention (pp. 300-321). London: Jossey Bass.
22. Sebba, L. (1996). Third parties: Victims and the criminal justice system. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
23. Sells, J. N., & Hargrave, T. D. (1998). Forgiveness: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 21-36.
24. Shapland, J. (1984). Victims, the criminal justice system and compensation. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 131-149.
25. Smith, B., & Hillenbrand, S. W. (1997). Making victims whole again: Restitution, victim-offender reconciliation programs, and compensation. In R. Davis (Ed.), Victims of crime (2nd ed., pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., et al. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641-655.
27. Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. New York: Criminal Justice Press.