The effect of video repositioning on the reliability of light-induced fluorescence imaging: An in vivo study

Caries Research

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 397-402

  Romane, D ^a   Bendika, Z ^a   Senakola, E ^a   Davies, R M ^b   Ellwood, R P ^b   Pretty, I A ^b,c  

^a RIGA STRADINS UNIVERSITY   (Latvia)

^b Dental Health Unit   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geometry; Imaging; In vivo study; Video repositioning

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARIES; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH DISEASE; VIDEORECORDING;

CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 23944498866     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000086847     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ando M, Eckert GJ, Stookey GK, Zero DT: Effect of imaging geometry on evaluating natural white-spot lesions using quantitative light-induced fluorescence. Caries Res 2004;38:39-44.
2. Dubrez B, Jacot-Descombes S, Cimasoni G: Reliability of a paralleling instrument for dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:358-364.
3. Ellwood RP, Davies RM, Worthington HV: Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system. J Periodontal Res 1997;32:241-248.
4. de Josselin de Jong E, Buchalla W, van der Veen M: QLF: New developments; in Stookey G (ed): Early Caries Detection III. Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2003.
5. de Josselin de Jong E, van der Veen JH: Video repositioning of QLF images. Proc Optical Methods in Caries Detection, Groningen, 2000.
6. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM: The effect of ambient light on QLF analyses. J Oral Rehabil 2002a;29:369-373.
7. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM: The effect of dehydration on quantitative light-induced fluorescence analysis of early enamel demineralization. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:179-184.
8. Pretty IA, Hall AF, Smith PW, Edgar WM, Higham SM: The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analyses. Br Dent J 2002b;193:105-109.
9. Sander L, Wenzel A, Hintze H, Karring T: Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography. J Periodontol 1996;67:1288-1291.
10. Tranaeus S, Shi XQ, Lindgren LE, Trollsas K, Angmar-Månsson B: In vivo repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative light-induced fluorescence method. Caries Res 2002;36:3-9.