|
|
Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-31
|
|
Hip geometry and its role in fracture: what do we know so far?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGE;
AGED;
BIOMECHANICS;
BODY WEIGHT;
BONE DENSITY;
CASE CONTROL STUDY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
FEMUR NECK FRACTURE;
HIP;
HIP FRACTURE;
HISTOLOGY;
HORMONE SUBSTITUTION;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
OSTEOPOROSIS;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PROGNOSIS;
RADIODENSITOMETRY;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BIOMECHANICS;
BODY WEIGHT;
BONE DENSITY;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY;
FEMALE;
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES;
HIP FRACTURES;
HIP JOINT;
HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OSTEOPOROSIS;
PROGNOSIS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
|
EID: 23944490209
PISSN: 15441873
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s11914-003-0005-8 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (64)
|
|
References (34)
|
