A performance model of the length and number of subject headings and index phrases

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 245-251

  Losee, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944483994     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. 1999. Modern information retrieval. Harlow, England: Addison Wesley.
2. Banks, J. 2004. Does the number of subject headings on a bibliographic record affect circulation intensity? Technical services quarterly 21n3. 17-24.
3. Brill, E. 1992. A simple rule-based part-of-speech tagger. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Morristown, NJ,: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 152-55.
4. Cleverdon, C. W. 1967. The Cranfield tests on index language devices. Aslib proceedings 19:173-92.
5. Dykstra, M. 1988. LC subject headings disguised as a thesaurus. Library journal 113: 42-46.
6. th ed. London: Library Association Publishers.
7. Greenberg, J. 2003. Metadata and the World Wide Web. Encyclopedia of library and information science. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 1876-88.
8. Khosh-Khui, S.A. 1986. Effects of subject specificity: part 1: specificity of L C subject headings and depth of subject analysis in monographic records. Technical services quarterly 4n2: 59-67.
9. Khosh-Khui, S. A. 1987. Effects of subject specificity: part 2: relationship of L C subject headings specificity and class notation length. Technical services quarterly 4n3: 33-39.
10. Losee, R. M. 1998. Text retrieval and filtering: analytic models of performance. Boston: Kluwer.
11. Porter, M. F. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14n3: 130-137.
12. Salton, G. and Lesk, M. E. 1968. Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 15: 8-36.
13. Sauperl, A. 2002. Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
14. Smiraglia, R. P. 1990. Subject access to archival materials using LCSH. Cataloging and classification quarterly 11n3-4: 63-90.
15. Studwell, W. E. 1990. Subject suggestions 6: some concerns relating to quantity of subjects. Cataloging and classification quarterly 10n4: 99-104.