Approach regarding the implantation of S-98 reliability program at the gentilly 2 power plant considering AP-913 equipment reliability process

Annual Canadian Nuclear Society Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 257-265

  Komljenovic, Dragon ^a   Vaillancourt, Raynald ^a   Messaoudi, Darragi ^a  

^a HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

Author keywords

AP 913; Equipment; Program; Reliability; S 98

Indexed keywords

EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY PROCESS; LICENSEES; NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR LICENSING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; STANDARDS;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

EID: 23944479476     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Commission Canadienne de Sûreté Nucléaire, (2001), Norme d'application de la réglementation S-98, Programme de fiabilité pour les centrales nucléaires, Ottawa.
2. AP-913, Equipment Reliability Process Description, Revision 1, (2001), INPO Atlanta.
3. Hydro-Québec, (1998), Document de référence DR-12, Programme de fiabilité, Révision 1.
4. CANDU Owners Group - Nuclear Safety Committee, (2003), Terms of Reference for Industry Working Group on Nuclear Plant Reliability Programs, Toronto.
5. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, (2001), Regulatory Guide G-98, Ottawa.
6. Critical Component Identification Process - Licensee Examples: Scoping and Identification of Critical Components in Support of INPO AP913, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA:2003. 1007953
7. AP-913 Industry Capabilities Gap Analysis Results, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2002. 1003478.
8. Risk Informed Asset Management (RIAM) Development Plan, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2001. 1006268
9. PMBasis Version 5.0 with Vulnerability Analysis Module, (2003), EPRI 1009275.
10. The Nuclear Professional, (2004), Raising the Bar, Palo Verde's Secret for Good Equipment Reliability.
11. Hydro-Québec, G2-RT-2004-01040-13, «Mise en œuvre du S-98 - Rapport d'étape », Février 2004