Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45° digital photography is inadequate

Ophthalmologica

Volumn 219, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 292-296

  Kuo, Hsi Kung ^a   Hsieh, Hsin Hung ^b   Liu, Rue Tsuan ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b YUAN'S GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Non mydriatic digital photography; Screening for diabetic retinopathy; Slit lamp biomicroscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOCRINOLOGY; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYDRIASIS; OPTIC DISK; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SLIT LAMP;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 23944478872     PISSN: 00303755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000086114     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Patz A, Smith RE: The ETDRS and Diabetes 2000. Ophthalmology 1991;98:739-740.
2. Javitt JC, Aiello LP: Cost effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:164-169.
3. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:36-51.
4. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 1998;352:837-853.
5. Backlund LB, Algvere PV, Rosenqvist U: Early detection of diabetic retinopathy by a mobile retinal photography service in partnership with primary health care teams. Diabet Med 1998;15(suppl 3):S32-S37.
6. Klein R: Barriers to prevention of vision loss caused by diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1073-1074.
7. British Diabetic Association: Retinal photographic screening for diabetic eye disease. A British Diabetic Association Report, London 1997.
8. Herbert HM, Jordan K, Flanagan DW: Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate? Eye 2003;17:497-500.
9. Younis N, Broadbent DM, Jamest M, Harding SP, Vora JP: Current status of screening for diabetic retinopathy in the UK. Diabet Med 2002;19(suppl 4):44-49.
10. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Thomas G, Foy C, Kirkpatrick JN, Lewis-Barned N, Harney B, Aldington SJ: The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy. Diabet Med 2003;20:467-474.
11. Aldington AJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK: Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia 1995;38:437-444.
12. Buxton MJ, Sculpher MJ, Ferguson BA, Humphreys JE, Altman JFB, Spiegelhalter DJ, Kirby AJ, Jacob JS, Bascon H, Dudbridge SB, Stead JW, Feest TG, Cheng H, Franklin SL, Courtney P, Talbot JF, Ahmed R, Dabbs TR: Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: A comparison of different methods. Diabet Med 1991;8:371-377.
13. Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neon C, White MC, Vora J: Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: The Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. Br Med J 1995;311:1131-1135.
14. Gillow JT, Muir Gray JA: The National Screening Committee review of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye 2001;15:1-2.
15. Heaven CJ, Cansfield J, Shaw KM: The quality of photographs produced by the non-mydriatic fundus camera in a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy: A 1-year prospective study. Eye 1993;7:787-790.
16. Penman AD, Saaddine JB, Hegazy M, Sous ES, Ali MA, Brechner RJ, Herman WH, Engelgau MM, Klein R: Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults. Diabet Med 1998;15:783-787.
17. George LD, Halliwell M, Hill R, Aldington SJ, Lusty J, Dunstan F, Owens DR: A comparison of digital retinal images and 35-mm color transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1998;15:250-253.
18. Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, Goatman KA, McHardy KC, Forrester JV, Sharp PF: A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 2003;20:528-534.
19. Stellingwerf C, Hardus P, Hooymans J: Two-field photography can identify patients with vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy: A screening approach in the primary care setting. Diabetes Care 2001;24:2086-2090.
20. Ryder REJ, Kong N, Bates AS, Sim J, Welch J, Kritzinger EE: Instant electronic imaging systems are superior to Polaroid at detecting sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1998;15:254-258.
21. Lim JI, LaBree L, Nichols T, Cardenas I: A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imagings and standard 35-mm slides for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:866-870.
22. George LD, Lusty J, Owens DR, Ollerton RL: Effect of software manipulation (Photoshop) of digitized retinal images on the grading of diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:911-913.
23. Newson RSB, Clover A, Costen MTJ, Sadler J, Newton J, Luff AJ, Canning CR: Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:799-802.