Evaluating multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: A research agenda

Child Welfare

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 433-458

  Lalayants, Marina ^a   Epstein, Irwin ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE MANAGEMENT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; COMMUNITY CARE; COOPERATION; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW; SOCIAL WORK;

CASE MANAGEMENT; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 23944475050     PISSN: 00094021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Bander, K., Fein, E., & Bishop, G. (1982). Child sex abuse treatment: Some barriers to program operation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 6, 180-191.
2. Bell, L. (2001). Patterns of interaction in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 65-80.
3. Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 71-84.
4. Cohn, A. H. (1982). Organization and administration of programs to treat child abuse and neglect. In E. H. Newberger (Ed.), Child abuse (pp. 89-103). Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Doss, B. C., & Idleman, L. S. (1994). The county child abuse protocol system in Georgia: An interagency cooperation approach to a complex issue. Child Welfare, 73, 675-689.
6. Durfee, M. J., & Gellert, G. A. (1992). Origins and clinical relevance of child death review teams. Children Today, 21(2), 29-34.
7. Ells, M. (2000). Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuse. Rockville: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved February 27, 2002, from http://www.ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/ portable_guides/forming/contents.html.
8. Epstein, I. (2001). Using available information in practice-based research: Mining for silver while dreaming of gold. In I. Epstein & S. Blumenfield (Eds.), Clinical data-mining in practice-based research (pp. 15-32). New York: Haworth Press.
9. Faller, K. C., & Henry, J. (2000). Child sexual abuse: A case study in community collaboration. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1215-1225.
10. Fargason, C. A., Jr., Barnes, D., Schneider, D., & Galloway, B. W. (1994). Enhancing multi-agency collaboration in the management of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 859-869.
11. Fryer, G. E. Jr., Poland, J. E., Bross, D. C., & Krugman, R. D. (1988). The child protective service worker: A profile of needs, attitudes, and utilization of professional services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 481-490.
12. Goldstein, J., & Griffin, E. (1993). The use of a physician-social worker team in the evaluation of sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(2), 8-93.
13. Hochstadt, N. J., & Harwicke, N. J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 365-372.
14. Jacobson, M. (2001). Child sexual abuse and the multidisciplinary team approach: Contradictions in practice. Childhood, 8, 231-250.
15. Jacobson, M. (2002). Local realities: A frontier perspective on child protection practice. Child Welfare, 81, 737-756.
16. Jaudes, P. K., & Martone, M. (1992). Interdisciplinary evaluations of alleged sexual abuse cases. Pediatrics, 89, 1164-1168.
17. Jensen, J. M., Jacobson, M., Unrau, Y., & Robinson, R. L. (1996). Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the children's advocacy model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 139-156.
18. Kaminer, B. B., Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1988). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect: A national survey. In D. C. Bross, R. D. Krugman, M. R. Lenherr, D. A. Rosenberg, & B. D. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 548-567). New York: Garland.
19. Kolbo, J. R., & Strong, E. (1997). Multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect: A national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2(1), 61-72.
20. Mouzakitis, C. M., & Goldstein, S. C. (1985). A multidisciplinary approach to treating child neglect. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 66(4), 218-225.
21. National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse. (1999). Current trends in child abuse reporting and fatalities: The results of the 1998 Annual Fifty State survey. Chicago: Author.
22. New York State Department of Social Services. (1995). Study of multidisciplinary approaches to child abuse investigations in New York State. New York: Author.
23. Onyskiw, J. E., Harrison, M. J., Spady, D., & McConnan, L. (1999). Formative evaluation of a collaborative community-based child abuse prevention project. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 1069-1081.
24. Pence, D., & Wilson, C. (1994). Team investigation of child sexual abuse: The uneasy alliance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
25. Sainz, A., & Epstein, I. (2001). Creating experimental analogs with available clinical information: Credible alternatives to "gold- standard" experiments? In I. Epstein & S. Blumenfield (Eds.), Clinical data-mining in practice-based research (pp. 163-183). New York: Haworth Press.
26. Sheppard, D. I., & Zangrillo, P. A. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse. Public Welfare, 54(1), 21-31.
27. Skaff, L. F. (1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, 67, 217-230.
28. Tjaden, P. G., & Anhalt, J. (1994). The impact of joint law enforcement-child protective services investigations in child maltreatment cases. Denver, CO: Center of Policy Research.
29. U.S. Department of Justice. (1993). Joint investigations of child abuse: Report of a symposium. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Winton, M. A., & Mara, B. A. (2001). Child abuse and neglect: Multidisciplinary approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.