Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 530-534

  Rayner, Keith ^a   Johnson, Rebecca L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALEXIA; CASE REPORT; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; TIME;

DYSLEXIA, ACQUIRED; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 23944469856     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01570.x     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Bowers, J. (1998). Extent and limits of covert lexical activation in letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 53-92.
2. Arguin, M., Fiset, S., & Bub, D. (2002). Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 79, 535-555.
3. Behrmann, M., Plaut, D.C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A literature review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7-51.
4. Behrmann, M., Shomstein, S.S., Black, S.E., & Barton, J.J.S. (2001). The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and non-reading tasks. Neuropsychologia, 39, 983-1002.
5. Coslett, H.B., & Saffran, E.M. (1989). Evidence for preserved reading in pure alexia. Brain, 112, 327-359.
6. Howard, D. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 34-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. McConkie, G.W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during an eye fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
8. Osswald, K., Humphreys, G.W., & Olson, A. (2002). Words are more than the sum of their parts: Evidence for detrimental effects of word-level information in alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 675-695.
9. Patterson, K.E., & Kay, J. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 411-441.
10. Price, C.J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading: Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 427-457.
11. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
12. Rayner, K., & Bertera, J.H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
13. Rayner, K., Inhoff, A.W., Morrison, R.E., Slowiaczek, M.L., & Bertera, J.H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167-179.
14. Shallice, T., & Saffran, E. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429-458.
15. Warrington, E.K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.