Scientific group cohesiveness at the National University of México

Scientometrics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 55-66

  Mariana, Lima ^a   Liberman, Sofía ^a   Russell, Jane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944469422     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0237-8     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. ANDREWS, F. M. (1979), Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge University Press, London.
2. BACK, K. W. (1951), Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46 : 9-23.
3. CARRON, A. V., L. R. BRAWLEY, W. N. WIDMEYER (1985), The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7 : 244-266.
4. CARRON, A. V., L. R. BRAWLEY (2000), Cohesion. Small Group Research, 31 : 89-107.
5. CRANE, D. (1972), Invisible Colleges. Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
6. ELLIS, D. C., B. A. FISHER (1994), Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process. 4th ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
7. HAVELOCK, R. C. (1973), Planning for Innovation, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
8. KOWALEWSKA, S. (1979), Patterns of influence and performance of research units. In: Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 169-188.
9. LANGFRED, C., M. SHANLEY (1997), The importance of organizational context, I: A conceptual model of cohesiveness and effectiveness in work groups. Public Administration Quarterly, 2 : 349-369.
10. LIEBERMAN, M. A., I. D. YALOM, M. B. MILES (1973), Encounter Groups: First Facts, Basic Books, New York.
11. LIBERMAN, S. S., K. B. WOLF (1997), The flow of knowledge: Scientific contacts in formal meetings. Social Networks, 19 : 271-283.
12. LIBERMAN, S. S., K. B. WOLF (1998), Bonding number in scientific disciplines. Social Networks, 20 : 239-246.
13. MEADOWS, A. J. (1998), Communicating Research, Academic Press, San Diego.
14. MULLINS, N. C. (1972), The development of a scientific speciality, Minerva, 10 : 51-82.
15. POLANYI, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. PRICE, D. DE S. (1963), Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
17. REY-ROCHA, J., M. J. MARTIN-SEMPERE, B. GARZÓN (2002), Research productivity of scientists in consolidated vs. non-consolidated teams: The case of Spanish university geologists, Scientometrics, 55 : 137-156.
18. RIDGEWAY, C. L. (1983), The Dynamics of Small Groups, St. Martin's, New York.
19. RUSSELL, J. M. (1994), A model for the evaluation of the performance of scientists from the developing world, based on journal impact factors, Knowledge and Policy, 7 (3) : 43-53.
20. RUSSELL, J. M., S. LIBERMAN (2002), Desarrollo de las bases de un modelo de comunicación de la producción científica de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25 (4) : 361-370.
21. SEGLEN, P. O., D. W. AKSNES (2000), Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research, Scientometrics, 49 : 125-143.
22. STANKIEWITZ, R. (1979), The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance, In: Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 191-222.
23. STOKES, T. D., J. A. HARTLEY (1989), Coauthorship, social structure and influence within specialties. Social Studies of Science, 19: 101-125.
24. TAYLOR, D. W., W. L. FAUST (1952), Twenty questions: Efficiency in problem solving groups as a function of size of group, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44 : 360-368.
25. VISART, N. (1979) Communication between and within research units. In: Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. F. M. ANDREWS (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 223-252.
26. WALLMARK, J. T., B. SELLERBERG (1966), Efficiency vs. size of research teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-13 : 137-142.