Do child molesters deliberately fake good on cognitive distortion questionnaires? An information processing-based investigation

Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-200

  Gannon, Theresa A ^a   Polaschek, Devon L L ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Child molester; Cognitive distortion; Faking good; Response times; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944442823     PISSN: 10790632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11194-005-4604-z     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 189-103.
2. Abel, G. G., Gore, D. K., Holland, C. L., Camp, N., Becker, J. V., & Rathner, J. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135-153.
3. Arkowitz, S., & Vess, J. (2003). An evaluation of the Bumby RAPE and MOLEST scales as measures of cognitive distortions with civilly committed sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 237-249.
4. Bakker, L. W., Hudson, S. M., Wales, D., & Riley, D. N. (1998). And there was light: Evaluating the Kia Marama Treatment Programme for New Zealand sex offenders against children. Wellington: Department of Corrections.
5. Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley.
6. Beckett, R., Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Fordham, A. S. (1994). Community-based treatment for sex offenders: An evaluation of seven treatment programmes. London: Home Office.
7. Beech, A. R., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. C. (1998). Step 3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. London: Home Office.
8. Beech, A. R., Fisher, D., Beckett, R. C., & Scott-Fordham, A. (1998). An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. Research Findings, 79, 1-4.
9. Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., & Burns, J. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 129-143.
10. Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
11. Bumby, K. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Developments and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
12. Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
13. Copello, A. G., & Tata, P. R. (1990). Violent behavior and interpretative bias: An experimental study of the resolution of ambiguity in violent offenders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 417-428.
14. Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144-150.
15. Fekken, G. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1988). Predicting consistent psychological test item responses: A comparison of models. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 873-882.
16. Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1980). Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences, Memory and Cognition, 8, 216-225
17. Gannon, T. A. (in press). Increasing honest responding on cognitive distortions in child molesters: The bogus pipeline procedure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
18. Gannon, T. A., Wright, D. B., Beech, A. R., & Williams, S. E. (2005). Do child molesters hold distorted beliefs? What does their memory recall tell us? Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. George, M. S., & Skinner, H. A. (1990). Using response time latency to detect inaccurate responses in a computerized lifestyle assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 167-175.
20. Hanson, R. K., Gizzarelli, R., & Scott, H. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187-202.
21. Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Cotton, D. H. G. (1991). Assessing psychopathology using structured test-item response latencies. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 111-118.
22. Holden, R. R., Kroner, D. G., Fekken, G. C., & Popham, S. M. (1992). A model of personality test item response dissimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 272-279.
23. Holden, R. R., Wood, L. L., & Tomashewski, L. (2001). Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 160-169.
24. Horley, J. (2000). Cognitions supportive of child molestation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 551-564.
25. Hsu, L. M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J. R. (1989). Faking detection validity and increment validity of response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 278-295.
26. Johnston, L., & Ward, T. (1996). Social cognition and sexual offending: A theoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 55-80.
27. Kindt, M., & Brosschot, J. F. (1997). Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 644-648.
28. Kolton, D. J. C., Boer, A., & Boer, D. P. (2001). A revision of the Abel and Becker Cognition Scale for intellectually disabled sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 217-219.
29. Langevin, R. (1991). A note on the problem of response set in measuring cognitive distortions. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 287-292.
30. Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Marshall, W. L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
32. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Sachdev, S., & Kruger, R. (2003). Distorted attitudes and perceptions, and their relationship with self esteem and coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 171-181.
33. McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 25-36.
34. Offending Behaviour Programmes Unit. (2000). The SOTP core programme: Assessment and evaluation manual. London: Home Office.
35. Polaschek, D. L. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists. What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385-406
36. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with outliers. Psychological Review, 114, 510-532.
37. Rogers, T. B. (1977). Self-reference in memory: Recognition of personality items. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 295-305.
38. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
39. Salter, A. C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and their victims: A practical guide. London: Sage.
40. Schlenker, B. R., Pontari, B. A., & Christopher, A. N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 15-32.
41. Swaffer, T., Hollin, C., Beech, A., Beckett, R., & Fisher, D. (1999). An exploration of child sex abusers' cognitive distortions with specific reference to the role of anger. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 4, 31-44.
42. Tierney, D. W., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). An evaluation of self-report measures of cognitive distortions and empathy among Australian sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 495-519.
43. Vanhouche, W., & Vertommen, H., (1999). Assessing cognitive distortions in sex offenders: A review of commonly used versus recently developed instruments. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 163-187.
44. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507.