Minimizing vulnerability: Selective interdependencies after welfare reform

Qualitative Sociology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 235-254

  Rogers Dillon, Robin ^a   Haney, Lynne ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Dependency; Gender; TANF; Welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944434136     PISSN: 01620436     EISSN: 15737837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-005-6369-6     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T. (1994). Welfare realities - From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Bavier, R. (2002). "The impart of welfare reform on families in data from the survey of income and program participation." Working Paper 292. Joint Center for Poverty Research. Chicago, Illinois.
3. Besharov, D. J. with Samari, N. (2001). "Child care after welfare reform" In R. Blank, & R. Haskins, (Eds.), The new world of welfare, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Blank, R., & Schmidt, L. (2001). "Work, wages, and welfare." In R. Blank, & R. Haskins, (Eds.), The new world of welfare, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
5. Bloom, D., & Michalopoulos, C. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect employment and income: A synthesis of research New York: MDRC.
6. Broder, J. M. (1997). "Keeping score: Big social changes revive the false god of numbers." New York Times, August 17.
7. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.
8. Chaudry, A. (2004). Putting children first: How low-wage working mothers manage child care New York: Russell Sage Foundation
9. Cherlin, A., et al. (2000). "Welfare, children and families: A three city study" Policy Brief 00-1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
10. Corcoran, M., Danzinger, S., Kalil, A., & Seefeldt, K. (2000). "How welfare reform is affecting women's work" Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26: 241-69.
11. Danziger, S., et al. (2000). "Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients." In R. Cherry, & W. Rodgers (Eds.) Prosperity for all? The economic boom and African Americans, New York: Russell Sage foundation.
12. Edin, K. (2000). "What do low-income single mothers say about marriage?" Social Problems, 47(1), 112-133.
13. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Ellwood, D. (1996). "Welfare reform as I knew it: When bad things happen to good policies" The American Prospect, 26, 22-29.
15. Fitzgerald, J. M., & Ribar, D. (2001). "The impact of welfare waivers on female headship decisions" Working Paper 247. Joint Center for Poverty Research. Chicago, Illinois.
16. Foley, K. (1998). "Attrition among the Baltimore study population: 1966-1995," Baltimore Study Working Paper Series 98-2, Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania.
17. Furstenberg, F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. (1987). Adolescent mothers in later life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). "Dependency demystified: Inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state." Social Politics, 1, 4-31.
19. Geronimus, A. T. (1997). "Teenage childbearing and personal responsibility." Political Science Quarterly, 112(3), 405-430.
20. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Goodwin, J. (1997). Gender and the politics of welfare reform: Mothers' pensions in Chicago, 1911-1929, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Haney, L., & March, M. (2002). "Other fathering: Paternal form and the politics of welfare." Unpublished manuscript.
23. Haney, L., & Rogers-Dillon, R., forthcoming "Beyond dependency: Welfare reform and the reconfiguration of social inequality." In M. Romero, & E. Margolis (eds.) Blackwell Companion to Social Inequality, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
24. Handler, J. F., & Y. Hasenfeld. (1997). We the poor people: Work, poverty, and welfare. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Hao, L., & Brinton, M. (1997). "Productive activities and support systems of single mothers." American Journal of Sociology, 102(5), 1305-1344.
26. Hamilton, G. (2002). Moving people from welfare to work Lessons from the national evaluation of welfare-to-work Strategies. New York: MDRC.
27. Harrington, M. (2000). Care and Equality. New York: Routledge.
28. Haskins, R., & Blank, R. (2001). "Welfare reform: An agenda for reauthorization" In R. Blank, & R. Haskins (Eds.). The new world of welfare, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29. Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children. New York: Oxford.
30. Kittay, E. F. (1997). "Human dependency and Rawlsian equality. " In D. T. Meyers, (Ed.) pp. 219-226, Feminists rethink the self, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31. Knox, V., London, A., & Scott, E. (2003). "Welfare reform, work and childcare: The role of informal care in the lives of low-income women and children." New York: MDRC.
32. Little, D. (1999). "Independent workers, dependent mothers: Discourse, resistance, and AFDC workfare programs." Social Politics, 6, 161-202.
33. McDonald, K. B., & Armstrong, E. M. (2001). "De-romanticizing black intergenerational support: The questionable expectations of welfare reform." Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 213-223.
34. Mead, L. (1997). The new paternalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
35. Mead, L. (1986). Beyond entitlement. New York: Free Press.
36. Meyer, M. H., & Storbakken, M. K. (1999). "Shifting the burden back to bamilies?" In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Carework: Gender, labor, and the welfare state, New York: Routledge.
37. Misra, J., Moller, S., & Karides, M. (2003). "Envisioning dependency: Changing media depictions of welfare recipients in the 20th Century." Social Problems, 50(4), 482-504.
38. Miller, C. (2002). Leavers, stayers, and cyclers: An analysis of the welfare caseload New York: MDRC
39. Mink, G. (1999). "Aren't poor single mothers women? Feminists, welfare reform, and welfare justice." In Whose Welfare? Mink, G. (Eds.) Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40. Moffitt, R. (1992). "Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: A review," Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1-61.
41. Moore, K. A., Zaslow, M., McGroder, S., & Tout, K. (2001). "Child care after welfare reform, comment" In R. Blank, & R. Haskins, (Eds.), The new world of welfare, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42. Murray, C. (2001). "Family formation." In Blank, R. and Haskins, R. (Eds.). The new world of welfare, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
43. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground. New York: Basic Books.
44. Newman, K. (1999). No shame in my game. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
45. Peck, J. (2001). Workfare states. New York: Guilford Press.
46. Raphael, J. (1996). "Prisoners of abuse: Policy implications of the relationship between domestic violence and welfare receipt." Clearinghouse Review, 30, 186-194.
47. Riemer, J. (2001). Working at the margins: Moving off welfare in America. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
48. Roberts, D. (1999). "Welfare's ban on poor motherhood." In G. Mink (Ed.) Ithaca, Whose welfare? NY: Cornell University Press.
49. Rogers-Dillon, R. H. (2004). The welfare experiments. Stanford University Press.
50. Rogers-Dillon, R. H. (2001). "What do we really know about welfare reform?" Society, 38.(2), 7-15.
51. Rose, N. E. (1995). Workfare or fair work: Women, welfare, government work programs. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
52. Scott, E. K., London, A. S., & Myers, N. A. (2002). "Dangerous dependencies: The intersection of welfare reform and domestic violence." Gender and Society, 16(6), 878-897.
53. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Stack, C. (1974). All our kin. New York: Basic Books
55. Tanner, M. (1996). The end of welfare: Fighting poverty in civil society. Washington D. C: The Cato Institute.
56. Thomas, S. (1995). "Exchanging welfare checks for wedding rings: Welfare reform in New Jersey and Wisconsin." Affilia, 10(2), 120-137.
57. Toner, R. (2002). "Welfare chief is hoping to promote marriage." New York Times, February 19.
58. Weaver, R. K. (2000). Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.