A note on weakest crossover

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 124-140

  Ruys, E G ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Sloppy identity; Topicalization; Weak crossover; Weakest crossover

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844558285     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438904322793365     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Authier, J.-Marc. 1992. Iterated CPs and embedded topicalization. Linguistic Inquiry 23:329-336.
2. Authier, J.-Marc. 1993. Nonquantificational wh and weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 24:161-168.
3. Browning, M. A. 1987. Null operator constructions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
4. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
11. Clark, Robin. 1992. Scope assignment and modification. Linguistic Inquiry 23:1-28.
12. Contreras, Heles. 1984. A note on parasitic gaps. Linguistic Inquiry 15:704-713.
13. Cooper, Robin. 1979. The interpretation of pronouns. In Syntax and semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, ed. by Frank Heny and Helmut S. Schnelle, 61-92. New York: Academic Press.
14. Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
15. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Hardt, Daniel. 1992. VP ellipsis and semantic identity. In SALT II, ed. by Chris Barker and David Dowty, 145-161. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 40. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
17. Hardt, Daniel. 1999. Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 22:185-219.
18. Higginbotham, James. 1980. Anaphora and GB: Some preliminary remarks. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of NELS, ed. by John T. Jensen, 223-236. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa 9.4. Ottawa, Ont.: University of Ottawa, Department of Linguistics.
19. Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical Form, binding, and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14:395-420.
20. Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form: From GB to minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Karttunen, Lauri. 1969. Pronouns and variables. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green, and Jerry L. Morgan, 108-116. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
22. Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1982. Variables and the Bijection Principle. The Linguistic Review 2:139-160.
23. Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335-391.
24. Lasnik, Howard. 1976. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2:1-22.
25. Lasnik, Howard. 1991. On the necessity of binding conditions. In Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, ed. by Robert Freidin, 7-28. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26. Also in Howard Lasnik, Essays on anaphora, 149-167. Dordrecht: Kluwer (1989).
27. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1991. Move α: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
28. Lasnik, Howard, and Tim Stowell. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22:687-720.
29. Lee, Gunsoo. 1996. Referentiality and weak crossover. In CLS 32. Vol. 1, Papers from the Main Session, ed. by Lise M. Dobrin, Kora Singer, and Lisa McNair, 225-236. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
30. May, Robert. 1988. Ambiguities of quantification and wh: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 118-135.
31. McCloskey, James. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A′-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In The syntax and semantics of modern Celtic languages, ed. by Randall Hendrick, 199-248. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
32. Merchant, Jason. 1999. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
33. Montalbetti, Mario. 1984. After binding. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
34. Mulder, René, and Marcel den Dikken. 1992. Tough parasitic gaps. In NELS 22, ed. by K. Broderick, 303-317. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
35. Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32:303-344.
36. Partee, Barbara, and Emmon Bach. 1984. Quantification, pronouns, and VP anaphora. In Truth, interpretation and information, ed. by Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, 99-130. Dordrecht: Foris.
37. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiences and cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
38. Postal, Paul. 1993. Remarks on weak crossover effects. Linguistic Inquiry 24:539-556.
39. Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
40. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
41. Reinhart, Tanya. 1986. Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. In Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. 1, ed. by Barbara Lust, 123-150. Dordrecht: Reidel.
42. Reinhart, Tanya. 1987. Specifier and operator binding. In The representation of(in)definiteness, ed. by Eric J. Reuland and Alice G. B. ter Meulen, 130-167. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
43. Reinhart, Tanya. 1991. Elliptic conjunctions: Non-quantificational LF. In The Chomskyan turn, ed. by Asa Kasher, 360-384. Oxford: Blackwell.
44. Ruys, E. G. 1992. The scope of indefinites. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University. Utrecht: LEd.
45. Ruys, E. G. 1994. A global economy analysis of weak crossover. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema and Crit Cremers, 223-234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Ruys, E. G. 2000. Weak crossover as a scope phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 31:513-539.
47. Safir, Ken. 1984. Multiple variable binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15:603-638.
48. Safir, Ken. 1996. Derivation, representation, and resumption: The domain of weak crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 27:313-339.
49. Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction in Ā-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30:587-620.
50. Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
51. Stowell, Tim. To appear. Adjuncts, arguments, and crossover. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.
52. Stroik, Thomas. 1990. Adverbs as V-sisters. Linguistic Inquiry 21:654-661.
53. Tomioka, Satoshi. 1996. On the mismatch between variable binding and sloppy identity. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by José Camacho, Lina Choueiri, and Maki Watanabe, 541-556. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
54. Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8:101-139.