Naked

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 353, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 645-648

  Gawande, Atul ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST EXAMINATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENTIATION; ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; MALE; MALPRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SEXUAL CRIME; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SEX OFFENSES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23844556888     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp058120     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Intimate examinations. London: General Medical Council Standards Committee, December 2001.
2. Gynaecological examinations: guidelines for specialist practice. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, July 2002.
3. Ad Hoc Committee on Physician Impairment. Report on sexual boundary issues. Dallas: Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, April 1996.
4. Dehlendorf CE, Wolfe SM. Physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses. JAMA 1998;279:1883-8.
5. Enbom JA, Thomas CD. Evaluation of sexual misconduct complaints: the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners, 1991 to 1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:1340-8.