A conceptual framework to increase usability of outcome research for evidence-based practice

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 351-355

  Sudsawad, Pimjai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; UNITED STATES;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23844555911     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.59.3.351     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bennett, S., Tooth, L., McKenna, K., Rodger, S., Strong, J., Ziviani, J., et al. (2003). Perceptions of evidence-based practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 13-22.
2. Campbell, T. W. (1996). Systemic therapies and basic research. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 15(3), 15-39.
3. Champion, V. L., & Leach, A. (1989). Variables related to research utilization in nursing: An empirical investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 705-710.
4. Di Fabio, R. D. (1999). Myth of evidence-based practice. Journal of Orthopeadics & Sports Physical Therapy, 29, 632-634.
5. Dubouloz, C.-J., Egan, M., Vallerand, J., & von Zweck, C. (1999). Occupational therapists' perceptions of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 445-453.
6. Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Tornquist, E. M., & Wiese, R. A. (1995). Administrators' views on barriers to research utilization. Applied Nursing Research, 8, 44-49.
7. Gervais, I. S., Poirier, A., Van Iterson, L., & Egan, M. (2002). Attempting to use a Cochrane review: Experience of three occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 110-113.
8. Holm, M. B. (2000). The 2000 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture: Our mandate for the new millennium: Evidence-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 575-585.
9. Kajermo, K. N., Nordström, G., Krusebrant, Å., & Björvell, H. (1998). Barriers and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived by group of registered nurses in Sweden. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 798-807.
10. Kajermo, K. N., Nordström, G., Krusebrant, Å. & Björvell, H. (2000). Perceptions of research utilization: Comparisons between health care professionals, nursing students and a reference group of nurse clinicians. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 99-109.
11. Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427-452.
12. Kazdin, A. E., & Kendall, P. C. (1998). Current progress and future plans for developing effective treatments: Comments and perspectives. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 217-226.
13. Keith, R. A. (1995). Conceptual basis of outcome measures. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 73-80.
14. Kendall, P. C., & Grove, W. M. (1988). Normative comparisons in therapy outcome. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147-158.
15. Law, M., & Baum, C. (1998). Evidence-based practice occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 131-135.
16. Morrow-Bradley, C., & Elliot, R. (1986). Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41, 188-197.
17. Ogles, B. M., Lunnen, K. M., & Bonesteel, K. (2001). Clinical significance: History, application, and current practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 421-446.
18. Ottenbacher, K. J., Barris, R., & Van Deusen, J. (1986). Some issues related to research utilization in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 111-116.
19. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
20. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
21. Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
22. Sbordone, R. J. (1996). Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. In R. J. Sbordone, & C. J. Long (Eds.), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (pp. 15-41). Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press.
23. Schiller, M. R. (1998). Linking outcomes research, education, and practice. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 2(6), 1-8.
24. Shakespeare, T. P., Gebski, V., Veness, M. J., & Simes, J. (2001). Improving interpretation of clinical studies by use of confidence levels, clinical significance curves, and risk-benefit contours. Lancet, 357, 1349-1353.
25. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. (2002). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) Long Range Plan for Fiscal Years 1999-2003 (Section three: Priorities for related activities, Chapter 8: Knowledge dissemination and utilization). Retrieved August 10, 2003, from http://www.ncddr.org/new/announcements/nidrr_lrp/lrp_kdu.html#kdu
26. Sweetland, J., & Craik, C. (2001). The use of evidence-based practice by occupational therapists who treat adult stroke patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 256-261.
27. Turner, P., & Whitfield, T. W. A. (1997). Physiotherapists' use of evidence based practice: A cross-national study. Physiotherapy Research International, 2, 17-29.
28. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 11, 203-214.