Validation of an interpersonal circumplex model by means of directional statistics: Perspectives of experts, laymen and patients;Zur Validierung eines interpersonalen Zirkumplexmodells mittels "directional statistics": Perspektiven von Experten, Laien und Patienten

Diagnostica

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 113-123

  Pokorny, Dan ^b   Kurth, Regina A ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Circular data; Directional statistics; Interpersonal Circle IPC; Interpersonal circumplex model; Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour SASB

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844554894     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.3.113     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Becker, P. (1998). Special feature: a multifacet circumplex model of personality as a basis for the description and therapy of personality disorders. Journal of Personal disorders, 12, 213-225.
2. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
3. Benjamin, L. S. (1979). Use of structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) and Markov chains to study dyadic interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 303-319.
4. nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Davies-Osterkamp, S., Hartkamp, N. & Junkert, B. (1993). Die Intrex-Kurzform. In W. Tress (Hrsg.), Die Strukturale Analyse Sozialen Verhaltens - SASB (S. 156-219), Heidelberg: Ansanger.
6. Fiedler, P. (2001). Interaktionsdiagnostik bei Familien und Paaren. In R.-D. Stieglitz, U. Baumann, & H. J. Freyberger (Hrsg.), Psychodiagnostik in Klinischer Psychologie, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie (S. 131-144). Stuttgart: Thieme.
7. Freedman, M. B., Leary, T., Ossorio, A. G. & Coffrey, H. S. (1954). The interpersonal dimension of personality. Journal of Personality, 20, 143-161.
8. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
9. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10. Horowitz, L.M., Strauss, B. & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme - Deutsche Version (2., überarb. und neunormierte Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
11. Kaiser, F. G., Frick, J. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001). Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens. Diagnostics 47, 88-95.
12. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementary in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
13. Kunst, H. & Hoyer, J. (2003). Psychometrische Analysen von IIP und Neo-FFI bei Straftätern. Diagnostica, 49, 24-33.
14. Kurth, R. A., Pokorny, D., Körner, A. & Geyer, M. (2002). Der Beziehungs-Muster-Fragebogen (BeMus): Validierung an-hand einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 52, 179-188.
15. Kurth, R. A., Pokorny, D., Kriebel, R., Paar, G. H. & Dahlbender, R. W. (1999). Selbsteinschätzung von Beziehungsmustern. Gruppenpsychotherapie & Gruppendynamik, 4, 321-337.
16. LaForge, R., Leary, T., Naboisek, H., Coffrey, H. S. & Freedman, M. B. (1954). The interpersonal dimension of personality: II. An objective study of repression. Journal of Personality, 23, 660-664.
17. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
18. Lorr, M. & Strack, S. (1999). A study of Benjamin's eight-facet structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 207-215.
19. Mardia, K. & Jupp, P. E. (2000). Directional Statistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
20. Pincus, A. L., Gurtman, M. B. & Ruiz, M. A. (1998). Structural analysis of social behavior (SASB): Circumplex analyses and structural relations with the Interpersonal Circle and the Five-Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1629-1645.
21. Pincus, A. L., Newes, S. L., Dickinson, K. A. & Ruiz, M. A. (1998). A comparison of three indexes to assess the dimensions of structural analysis of social behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 145-170.
22. Pukrop, R., Sass, H. & Steinmeyer, E. M. (2000). Circumplex models for the similarity relationship between higher-order factors of personality and personality disorders: an empirical analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41, 438-445.
23. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
24. Schaefer, E. S. (1965). A configurational analysis of children's reports of parent behavior. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 552-557.
25. Schmidt, J. A., Wagner, C. C. & Kiesler, D. J. (1999). Psychometric and circumplex properties of the octant scale impact message inventory (IMI-C): a structural evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 325-334.
26. Tracey, T. J. G. & Schneider, P. L. (1995). An evaluation of the circular structure of the checklist of Interpersonal transactions and the checklist of psychotherapy transactions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 496-507.
27. Tscheulin, D., Glossner, A. (1993). Die deutsche Übertragung der INTREX "Longform Questionnaires": Validität und Auswertungsgrundlage der SASB-Fragebogenmethode. In W. Tress (Hrsg.), Die Strukturale Analyse Sozialen Verhaltens - SASB (S. 125-155). Heidelberg: Ansanger.
28. Wahrig, G. (2000). Deutsches Wörterbuch (7., vollst. neu bearb. und aktual. Auflage). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Lexikon Verlag.
29. Wiggens, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
30. Zerssen, D. (2000). Variants of premorbid personality and personality disorder: a taxonomic model of their relationships. Europe Archive of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250, 234-248.