Risk-based design of cost-efficient remediation strategies at megasites

IAHS-AISH Publication

Volumn , Issue 297, 2005, Pages 249-255

  Serapiglia, Fabio ^a   Sievers, Judith ^b   Finkel, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b GICON GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cost efficiency; Megasites; Remediation technologies; Risk reduction; Site management

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NITRATES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

COST EFFICIENCY; MEGASITES; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY; RISK REDUCTION;

REMEDIATION;

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; REMEDIATION;

EID: 23844542120     PISSN: 01447815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. EU, European Union (2004) Groundwater protection against pollution under the Water Framework Directive. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/ water-framework/groundwater.html.
2. Rijnaarts, H. H. M. & Wolfgang, C. (2002) Development of an integrated management system for prevention and reduction of pollution of waterbodies at contaminated industrial megasites. In: Image-Train Cluster Meeting (Proc. Second Symp., Krakow, Poland), 41-47.
3. Teutsch, G., Rügner, H., Zamfirescu, D., Finkel, M. & M. Bittens (2001) Source remediation vs plume management: critical factors affecting cost-efficiency. Land Contamination & Reclamation 9(1), 128-139.
4. US EPA (2003) The DNAPL remediation challenge: is there a case for source depletion? Report EPA/600/R-03/143. December 2003.