Reliability and validity of the milliken activities of daily living scale

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 343-351

  Seaton, Mary K ^a   Groth, Gail N ^b   Matheson, Leonard ^a   Feely, Christine ^c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis   (United States)

^c Certus International ^*

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Activity limitations; ADL; Client centered; Hand function; Self report measure; Self report questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 23844532740     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-5941-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. WHO, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, World Health Organization 2004.
2. Klein R, Bell B. Self-care Skills: Behavioral Measurement with Klein-Bell ADL Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 335-338.
3. Granger C, Hamilton B. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1990. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 7: 108-113.
4. Granger C. Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation-version 5.0. Buffalo NY: Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, 1996.
5. Barthel D, Mahoney F. Functional evaluation: The barthel index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 62-65.
6. Totten P, Flinn-Wagner S. Functional evaluation of the hand. In: Stanley B, Tribuzi S, eds. Concepts in Hand Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1990, pp. 113-142.
7. Cassanova J, ed. Clinical Assessment Recommendations. American Society of Hand Therapists: Chicago, 2nd edn, 1992.
8. Katz J, Gelberman R, Wright E, Lew R, Liang M. Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care 1994; 32: 1127-1133.
9. Meenan R, Mason J, Anderson J, Guccione A, Kazis L. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis and Rheumatism 1992; 35(1): 1-10.
10. MacDermid J, Turgeon T, Richards R, Beadle M, Roth J. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: A reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12(8): 577-86.
11. Roach K, Budiamn-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4(4): 143-149.
12. Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of an upper extremity outcome measures: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39(9): S112.
13. van Lankveld W, van't Pad Bosch P, Bakker J, Terwindt S, Franssen M, van Riel P. Sequential occupational dexterity assessment (SODA): A new test to measure hand disability. J Hand Ther 1996; January-March: 27-32.
14. Martin D, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski M. Comparison of the musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire with the short form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and the sickness impact profile health status measures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1997; 79-A(9): 1323-1335.
15. Wright B, Linacre J. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 40: 857-860.
16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.
17. Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil 1993; 3(1): 15-30.
18. Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Hand Function Sort Examiner's Manual. Wildwood, MO: Employment Potential Improvement Corporation, 1996.
19. Matheson L. Evaluation of self-report assessment of function: Measurement properties and uses of the function sorts. J Occup Rehabil 2003.
20. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 2nd edn, 2000.
21. Feinstein A, Josephy B, Wells C. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 513-420.
22. Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther 1995; 62: 250-257.
23. Husted J, Gladman D, Farewell V, Long J. Validation of the revised and expanded version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales for patients with psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996; 23(6): 1015-1019.
24. Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A, Katz J. Functional Status Scale-"English." J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75(A): 1585-1592.
25. Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M. Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39(12): 1195-202.