City and innovation: Different size, different strategy

European Planning Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 853-877

  Therrien, Pierre ^a  

^a INDUSTRY CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SIZE EFFECT; URBAN ECONOMY;

EID: 23844524077     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654310500187961     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acs, Z.J. (2002) Innovation and the growth of cities, pp. xiv, 247 (Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Elgar; distributed by American International Distribution Corporation, Williston, VT).
2. Arvanitis, S. & Hollenstein, H. (1996) Industrial innovation in Switzerland: A model-based analysis with survey data, in: A. Kleinknecht (Ed.) Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators (London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin's Press).
3. Baldwin, J.R. & Hanel, P. (2003) Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press).
4. Bartholomew, D.J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I. & Galbraith, J.I. (2002) The Analysis and Interpretation of Multivariate Data For Social Scientists, Chapters 16-18 (Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press).
5. Bayona C., Garcia-Marco, T. & Huerta, E. (2001) Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms, Research Policy, 30, pp. 1289-1307.
6. Breschi, S. (1998) Agglomeration economies, knowledge spillovers, technological diversity and spatial clustering of innovations, LIUC Papers in Economics, #57 (Castellanza: Cattaneo University (LIUC)).
7. Carlino, G.A. (2001) Knowledge spillovers: Cities' role in the new economy, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 4th Quarter, pp. 17-26.
8. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569-596.
9. Dosi, G. (1988) The sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, pp. 1120-1171.
10. Ernst, H. (1998) Industrial research as a source of important patents, Research Policy, 27, pp. 1-15.
11. Feldman, M. (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2), pp. 5-25.
12. Feldman, M. (1994) The Geography of Innovation (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic).
13. Hanel, P. (2001) Current Intellectual Protection Practices by Manufacturing Firms in Canada, Working paper No. 01-09 (Sherbrooke: Economics Department, Université de Sherbrooke).
14. Karlsson, C. (1997) Product development, innovation networks, infrastructure and agglomeration economies, Annals of Regional Science, 31(3), pp. 235-258.
15. Kaufmann, A. & Tödtling, F. (2002) How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of upper Austria, Technovation, 22, pp. 147-159.
16. Landry, R. & Amara, N. (2003) Effects of sources of information on novelty of innovation in Canadian manufacturing firms, in: F. Gault (Ed.) Understanding Innovation in Canadian Industry (Kingston and Montréal: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, McGill-Queen's University Press).
17. Leiponen, A. (2000) Competencies, innovation, and profitability of firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, pp. 1-24.
18. Lever, W.F. (2002) Correlating the knowledge-base of cities with economic growth, Urban Studies, 39(5-6), pp. 859-870.
19. Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (2000) Knowledge, innovation activities and industrial evolution, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), pp. 289-313.
20. Montana, J. (2001) The changing nature of regional competitiveness, The Journal of City and State Public Affairs, Spring, pp. 9-17.
21. No, A. (2002) Agglomeration Effects in the Diffusion of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (Toronto: University of Toronto).
22. OECD/Eurostat (1997) Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Paris: OECD/ Eurostat).
23. Robson, M., Townsend, J. & Pavitt, K. (1988) Sectoral patterns of production and use of innovations in the UK: 1945-1983, Research Policy, 17(1), pp. 1-14.
24. Schaan, S. & Nemes, B. (2002) Survey of Innovation 1999, methodological framework: Decisions taken and lessons learned, Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division (SIEID), Working paper No. 12, Statistics Canada.
25. Tether, B.S. (2002) Who co-operate for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31, pp. 947-967.