More than typewriters, more than adding machines: Integrating information technology into political research

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 581-614

  Cousins, Ken ^a   McIntosh, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical software; Qualitative analysis; Quantitative analysis; Social science research methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844509814     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-005-3149-z     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Alexa, M. & Zuell, C. (1999). A review of Software for text Analysis. Mannheim, ZUMA.
2. Alexa, M. & Zuell, C. (2000). "Text Analysis Software: Commonalities, Difference and Limitations: The Results of a Review". Quality and Quantity 34(3): 299-321.
3. Ansell, C. (2000). Community Embeddedness and Collaborative Governance. Social Movement Analysis: The Network Perspective, Ross Priory, Loch Lemond, Scotland.
4. Bampton, R. & Cowton, C. J. (2002). The E-Interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
5. BBC, (2003). Dyke to open up BBC archive, British Broadcasting Corporation.
6. Benoit, K. & Laver, M. (2003). "Estimating Irish Party Positions Using Computer Word-scoring: The 2002 Elections." Irish Political Studies 17(2).
7. Bolden, R. & Moscarola, J. (2000). "Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide: The Lexical Approach to Textual Data Analysis." Social Science Computer Review 18(4): 450-460.
8. Bond, D. & Bond et al. J. (2003). "Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development." Journal of Peace Research 40(6): 733-745.
9. Bond, D. & Jenkins, J. C. (1997). "Mapping Mass Political Conflict and Civil Society: Issues and Prospects for the Automated Development of Event Data." Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(4): 533-579.
10. Bong, S. A. (2002). Debunking Myths in Qualitative Data Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
11. Bourdon, S. (2002). The Integration of Qualitative Data Analysis Software in Research Strategies: Resistances and Possibilities. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
12. Brace-Govan, J. (2002). "Qualitative Data for a Quantitative Audience: An Evaluative Framework for Analysis." Qualitative Research Journal 2(1): 47.
13. Brown, D. (2002). Going Digital and Staying Qualitative: Some Alternative Strategies for Digitizing the Qualitative Research Process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
14. Burnley, P. C. & Evans et al., W. (2002). "A Comparison of Approaches and Instruments for Evaluating a Geological Sciences Research Experiences Program." Journal of Geoscience Education 50(1): 15-24.
15. Burton, O. V., Ed. (2002). Computing in the social sciences and humanities. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
16. CACI International (2001). CACI Awarded "Mega 2" Contract With Department of Justice. Arlington, VA, CACI International, Inc: 2.
17. Carmichael, P. (2002). Extensible Markup Language and Qualitative Data Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
18. Carvajal, D. (2002). "The Artisan's Tools. Critical Issues When Teaching and Learning CAQDAS." Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3(2).
19. Clarke, P. (2000). The Internet as a medium for qualitative research. 2nd Annual Conference on World-Wide Web Applications, Centre for Research in Web-based Applications, Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa, Department of Information Studies.
20. Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
21. Coffey, A., & Holbrook et al., B. (1996). Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations, Sociological Research Online. 1.
22. Corney, M. & de Vel et al., O. (2002). Gender-Preferential Text Mining of E-mail Discourse. 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, Applied Computer Security Associates, Las Vegas, NV.
23. Corti, L. (2000). Progress and Problems of Preserving and Providing Access to Qualitative Data for Social Research: The International Picture of an Emerging Culture. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:3 December.
24. Corti, L. & Day et al., A. (2000). Confidentiality and Informed Consent: Issues for Consideration in the Preservation of and Provision of Access to Qualitative Data Archives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:3 December.
25. Crawford, H. K. & Leybourne et al., M. L. (2000). How we Ensured Rigour in a Multi-site, Multi-discipline, Multi-researcher Study. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:1 January.
26. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publishers, London.
27. DuBowe, J. S. (1982). "Automated Litigation Support: A Litigator's Primer." ABA Journal 68(9): 1118-1123.
28. Eagles, M. & Katz et al., R. S. (2000). "Controversies in political redistricting: GIS, geography, and society: editorial." Political Geography 19(2): 135-139.
29. Emery, P. (2003). Capturing Terrorists and Criminals: Speeding Up the Intelligence Gathering Process. McLean, VA, ZyLAB Technologies: 16.
30. Emery, P. (2003). Document and Records Management: Understanding The Differences and Embracing Integration. McLean, VA, ZyLAB Technologies: 4.
31. Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA.
32. Everton, S. F. (2004). A Guide for the Visually Perplexed: Visually Representing Social Networks. Stanford, CA.
33. Fielding, N. (1993). "Analysing qualitative data by computer." Social Research Update(1): 7.
34. Fielding, N. (2002). Automating the Ineffable: Qualitative software and the meaning of qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Action. T. May. Sage. London, pp.161-178.
35. Fielding, N. & Lee, R. (2002). "New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software." Field Methods 14(2): 197-216.
36. Fielding, N. & Lee, R. M. (1991). Using Computers in Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
37. Fielding, N. & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
38. Finel, B. I. & Lord Eds., K. M. (2002). Power and Conflict in the Age of Transparency. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
39. Fisher, D. (2003). Social Networks for End Users. Irvine, CA: 20.
40. Ford, K. & Oberski et al., I. (2000). "Computer-Aided Qualitative Analysis of Interview Data: Some Recommendations for Collaborative Working". The Qualitative Report. 4:3-4.
41. Fricker Jr, R. D. & Schonlau, M. (2002). "Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature." Field Methods 14(4): 347.
42. Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: explorations with NVivo. Open University, Philadelphia.
43. Gibbs, G. R. & Friese et al., S. (2002). The Use of New Technology in Qualitative Research. Introduction to Issue 3(2) of FQS. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3:2 May.
44. Heesterman, W. (1993). "Text Retrieval Software: AskSam, Idealist, Isys, Zyindex." Law Technology Journal 3(1): 7.
45. Hill, K. & Hughes, J. (1997). "Computer-Mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities." Political Communication 14: 3-27.
46. Hochheiser, H. (2003). Interactive Graphical Querying of Time Series and Linear Sequence Data Sets. Department of Computer Science. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, p. 313.
47. Introna, L. & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). "Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matter." The Information Society 16(3): 169-186.
48. Jones, S. (1999). Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
49. Juhnke, D. J. (2003). "Electronic Discovery in 2010." Information Management Journal 37(6): 34-40.
50. Keeva, S. (1990). "Why Litigation Support?: The Sky Is the Limit." ABA Journal 76(5): 76.
51. Kerlin, B. (2000). Qualitative research in the United States. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1:1 January.
52. Kimmelman, M. (2003). Webs Connecting the Power Brokers, the Money and, Ultimately, the World. New York Times, New York, p. 2.
53. King, G. & Lowe, W. (2003). "An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design." International Organization 57: 617-642.
54. King, G., Keohane, R. O. & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.T.
55. Kinnevy, S. C. & Enosh, G. (2002). "Problems and promises in the study of virtual communities." Journal of Technology in Human Services 19(2-3): 119-134.
56. Koppel, M., & Argamon et al., S. (2002). "Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender." Literary and Linguistic Computing 17(4): 401-412.
57. Krause, J. (2003). "What a Concept!" ABA Journal 89(9): 60.
58. La Porte, T. M. & Demchak et al., C. C. (2001). "Webbing Governance: Global Trends across National- Level Public Agencies." Communications of the ACM 44(1): 63-67.
59. Laver, M. & Benoit, K. (2002). "Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: Wordscoring Dáil Speeches." Irish Political Studies 17(1).
60. Laver, M. & Benoit et al., K. (2003). "Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data." American Political Science Review 97(2): 311-331.
61. Laver, M. & Garry, J. (2000). "Estimating policy positions from political texts." American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 619-634.
62. Lee, R. M. & Esterhuizen, L. (2000). "Computer Software and Qualitative Analysis: Trends, Issues and Resources." International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3(3): 231-243.
63. Leydesdorff, L. & Wouters, P. (1996). "Quantitative Measuring or Qualitative Understanding: Is it possible to bridge the divide in STS?" EASST Review 15(3): 5.
64. List, D. (2001). Know Your Audience: A Practical Guide to Media Research. Original Books, NZ.
65. LOC (2002). Preserving Our Digital Heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. US Library of Congress, Washington, DC, p. 74.
66. Mann, C. & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
67. Marshall, H. (2002). "What Do We Do When We Code Data?" Qualitative Research Journal 2(1): 56-70.
68. McLaughlin, W. S. (2003). "The use of the Internet for Political Action by Non-state Dissident actors in the Middle East." First Monday 8(11): 44.
69. Merriam, S. B., Ed. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
70. Min, S. (2003). Mark Lombardi: Global Networks. The Drawing Center, New York, 2.
71. Morse, J. M. & Barrett et al., M. (2002). "Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1(2).
72. Nagler, J. (1995). "Coding Style and Good Computing Practices." PS: Political Science and Politics 6(28): 488-493.
73. NRC (2003). Preparing for the Revolution: Information Technology and the Future of the Research University. National Acadamies Press, Washington, DC.
74. O'Muircheartaigh, C. & Campanelli, P. (1998). "The Relative Impact of Interviewer Effects and Sample Design Effects on Survey Precision." Statistics in Society 161(1): 63-77.
75. Parker, D. R. (1996). Emerging Uses of Computer Technology in Qualitative Research. Annual Conference of the Association of Louisiana Evaluators, Association of Louisiana Evaluators, New Orleans, LA.
76. PoliticsOnline (2004). 2004 Special Report on the Year of Internet and Politics, PoliticsOnline, Inc.
77. Raber, L. (1997). "Toxics Data: How Much is too Much?" Chemical and Engineering News 75(22): 26.
78. Roberts, C. W. (1997). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
79. Roberts, C. W. (2000). "A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis." Quality and Quantity 34(3): 259-274.
80. Schonlau, M., Fricker, J. & Ronald D et al. (2001). Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web. RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
81. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. Sage, London.
82. Smith, B. A. & Hesse-Biber, S. (1996). "Users' Experiences with Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Neither Frankenstein's Monster Nor Muse." Social Science Computer Review 14(4): 423-432.
83. Solomon, D. J. (2001). "Conducting Web-Based Surveys." ERIC Digest.
84. Starkey, B. A. & Blake, E. L. (2001). "Simulation in International Relations Education." Simulation and Gaming 32(4): 537-551.
85. Stephen, T. (1999). "Computer-Assisted Concept Analysis of HCR's First 25 Years." Human Communication Research 25(4): 498-513.
86. Stockdale, A. (2002). Tools for Digital Audio Recording in Qualitative Research, Social Research Update. Autumn 2002.
87. Sui, D. Z. & Hugill, P. J. (2002). "A GIS-Based Spatial Analysis on Neighborhood Effects and Voter turn-out:-A Case Study in College Station, Texas." Political Geography 21(2): 159-173.
88. Thelwall, M. (2001). "The Responsiveness of Search Engine Indexes." Cybermetrics 5(1): 8.
89. Thomas, G. D. (2000). The Machine-Assisted Creation of Historical Event Data Sets: A Practical Guide. International Studies Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
90. Thompson, R. (2002). Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2003.
91. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
92. Zhang, Y. (1999). "Scholarly use of Internet-Based Electronic Resources: A Survey Report." Library Trends 47(4): 746-770.