Dynamic modelling of packaging material flow systems

Waste Management and Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-166

  Tsiliyannis, Christos A ^a  

^a ANI N Environmental Ltd   (Greece)

Author keywords

Environmental modelling; Packaging materials; Packaging waste; Recycling; Reuse; Solid waste management; Wmr 672 1

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RECYCLING; REUSABILITY; SOLID WASTES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

DYNAMIC MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING; PACKAGING MATERIAL FLOW SYSTEMS; PACKAGING WASTE;

PACKAGING MATERIALS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PACKAGING MATERIALS; PUBLIC POLICY; RECYCLING; REUSABILITY; SOLID WASTES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; PACKAGING WASTE; RECYCLING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREECE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; LAW; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PACKAGING MATERIAL; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECYCLING; SIMULATION; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; BEER; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD PACKAGING; PACKAGING; PAPER; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GREECE; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

GLASS;

BEER; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FOOD PACKAGING; GLASS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PAPER; PRODUCT PACKAGING;

EID: 23844507572     PISSN: 0734242X     EISSN: 10963669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X05052041     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. European Commission (EC) (2000): Direction Generale ENV - WM Unit, Working Document on Revision of Directive 94/62, September 15, 2000. European Commission, Brussels.
2. Environment & Pira International (E PI) (2001): Evaluation of Costs and Benefits for the the Achievement of Reuse and Recycling Targets for Different Packaging Materials in the Frame of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive 94/62. EC Proposed Draft Final Report RDC, www.epinet.org, Washington USA, May 2001.
3. European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (2000): How the Requirements of the European Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive 94/62 are Bypassed by CEN Standards. www.eeb.org, EEB, Brussels, September 2000.
4. Millock, K. (1994): Packaging waste management in Sweden, a product change. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 10, 349-375.
5. Pricewaterhouse-Coopers (PC) (1997): Review of 1997 Data on Packaging and Packaging Waste Recycling and Recovery, Utrecht, Netherlands. www.pwcglobal.com, Pricewaterhouse-Coopers CIP/SCM-3/SV/99856, Utrecht, 29 October 1999.
6. RENDAN (1993): A/S, Analysis of Packaging and Packaging Waste Flows, Final Report. Copenhagen, Morten Harboe-Jepsen Copenhagen, March 20, 1993 Final Report 1993.
7. RENDAN (1998): Waste Statistics 1998. Danish Ministry for Environment and Energy, Copenhagen.
8. Tsiliyannis, C. (2003): Packaging Material Reuse, Recycle and Waste: A Dynamic Flow Model, Report, June 2003. aniontenet.gr, ANION Environmental, Athens.
9. Tsiliyannis, C. (1999): Comparison of environmental impacts from solid waste treatment and disposal facilities. Waste Management and Research, 17, 231-241.
10. Wuppertal Institute (WI) (1997): Packaging Material Flows in Germany. www.wupperinst.org. Wuppertal Institute, Germany, January.
11. YPEHODE (2001): Packaging Materials in Greece 2001, (PM-GR 2001). Study commissioned by the Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works (YPEHODE), Athens, GR. www.minenv.gr, Final Report, December 2001, Publicly available since Jan. 2002.