Optimizing a layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data using Broyden's update and ID derivatives

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 247-261

  Christiansen, Anders V ^a   Auken, Esben ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

1D derivatives; 2D; Broyden's update; DC resistivity; Inversion; Optimizations

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATION THEORY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION;

1D DERIVATIVES; 2D; BRODEN'S UPDATE; DC RESISTIVITY; INVERSION; RESISTIVITY DATA;

DATA ACQUISITION;

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY;

EID: 23844502690     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(04)00055-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Akin, J.E., 1982. Application and Implementation of Finite Element Methods. Computational Mathematics and Applications Series. Academic Press.
2. Auken, E., Christiansen, A.V., 2004. Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data. Geophysics 69, 752-761.
3. Bemstone, C., Dahlin, T., 1999. Assessment of two automated DC resistivity data acquisition systems for landfill location surveys: two case studies. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics 4 (2), 113-121.
4. Broyden, C.G., 1965. A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations. Mathematics of Computation 19, 577-593.
5. Christiansen, A.V., Auken, E., 2003. Layered 2-D inversion of profile data, evaluated using stochastic models. Proceedings volume, 3DEM-III, February 2003, Adelaide.
6. Dahlin, T., 1996. 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications. First Break 14 (7), 275-283.
7. Dahlin, T., Zhou, B., 2002. Gradient and mid-point referred measurements for multi-channel 2D resistivity imaging. Proceedings, Integrated Case Histories Session, Proceedings of the 8th Meeting EEGS-ES, Aveiro, Portugal.
8. Dey, A., Morrison, H.F., 1979. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped 2-dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting 27, 106-136.
9. Johansen, H.K., 1977. A man/computer interpretation system for resistivity soundings over a horizontally stratified earth. Geophysical Prospecting 25, 667-691.
10. Loke, M.H., Barker, R.D., 1996. Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 44, 131-152.
11. Loke, M.H., Dahlin, T., 2002. A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics 49, 149-162.
12. McGillivray, P.R., 1992. Forward modeling and inversion of DC resistivity and MMR data. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
13. McGillivray, P.R., Oldenburg, D.W., 1990. Methods for calculating fréchet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: a comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting 38, 499-524.
14. Menke, William, 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis-Discrete Inverse Theory. (Rev. ed.). International Geophysics Series. Academic Press, San Diego.
15. Møller, I., Jacobsen, B.H., Christensen, N.B., 2001. Rapid inversion of 2-D geoelectrical data by multi-channel deconvolution. Geophysics 66, 800-808.
16. Olayinka, A.I., Yaramanci, U., 2000. Use of block inversion in the 2-D interpretation of apparent resistivity data and its comparison with smooth inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics 45, 63-81.
17. Oldenburg, D.W., Ellis, R.G., 1991. Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping. Geophysical Journal International 105, 325-353.
18. Oldenburg, D.W., Li, Y., 1994. Inversion of induced polarization data. Geophysics 59, 1327-1341.
19. Panissod, C., Lajarthe, M., Tabbagh, A., 1997. Potential focusing: a new multielectrode array concept, simulating study, and field tests in archaeological prospecting. Geophysics 38, 1-23.
20. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. The Art of Scientific Computing, Numerical Recipes, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-963.
21. Serban, D.Z., Jacobsen, B.H., 2001. The use of broad-band prior covariance for inverse palaeoclimate estimation. Geophysical Journal International 147, 29-40.
22. Smith, J.T., Booker, J.R., 1991. Rapid inversion of two and three-dimensional magnetotelluric data. Journal of Geophysical Research 96, 3905-3922.
23. Smith, T., Hoversten, M., Gasperikova, E., Morrison, F., 1999. Sharp boundary inversion of 2D magnetotelluric data. Geophysical Prospecting 47, 469-486.
24. Sørensen, K.I., 1996. Pulled array continuous electrical profiling. First Break 14, 85-90.
25. Sørensen, K.I., Auken, E., Christensen, N.B., Pellerin, L., 2004. An Integrated Approach for Hydrogeophysical Investigations: New Technologies and a Case History, Accepted for publication in SEC, NSG Vol II: Applications and Case Histories.
26. Torres-Verdín, C., Druskin, V., Fang, S., Knizhnerman, L.A., Malinverno, A., 2000. A dual-grid nonlinear inversion technique with applications to the interpretation of dc resistivity data. Geophysics 65, 1733-1745.
27. Van Overmeeren, R.A., Ritsema, I.L., 1988. Continuous vertical electrical sounding. First Break 6, 313-324.
28. Ward, S.H., Hohmann, G.W., 1988. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. Nabighian, M.N. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics vol. 1[4]. Society of exploration geophysicists (SEG). Investigations in geophysics. Neitzel, E.B., Tulsa, pp. 131-311.