Amassing the multitude: Revisiting early audience studies

Communication Theory

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 242-265

  Bratich, Jack Z ^a  

^a State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 23844500703     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ct/15.3.242     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Alasuutari, P. (1999). Introduction: Three phases of reception. In P. Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience (pp. 1-21). London: Sage.
2. Allor, M. (1988) Relocating the site of the audience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 217-233.
3. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
4. Ang, I. (1991). Desperately seeking audiences. London: Routledge.
5. Ang, I. (1996). Living room wars. New York: Routledge.
6. Balnaves, M., & O'Regan, T. (2002). Governing audiences. In M. Balnaves, T. O'Regan, & J. Sternberg (Eds.), Mobilising the audience (pp. 10-28). St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
7. Barker, M. (1997). The Newson report. In M. Barker & J. Petley (Eds.), Ill effects (pp. 12-31). London: Routledge.
8. Bennett, T. (1996). Figuring audiences and readers. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 145-60). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9. Bratich, J. (2003). Making politics reasonable: Conspiracism, subjectification, and governing through styles of thought. In J. Bratich, C. McCarthy, & J. Packer (Eds.), Foucault, cultural studies, and governmentality (pp. 67-100). Albany: State University of New York Press.
10. Burchell, G. (1991). Peculiar interests: Civil society and governing "the system of natural liberty." In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 119-150). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Butsch, R. (2000). The making of American audiences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cantril, H., Gaudet, H., & Herzog, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Carey, J. (1969). The communications revolution and the professional communicator. In P. Halmos (Ed.), The sociology of mass-media communicators (pp. 23-38). Keele, UK: Keele University.
14. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
15. Critical Art Ensemble. (2001). Digital resistance: Explorations in tactical media. New York: Autonomedia.
16. Cruz, J., & Lewis, J. (1994). Introduction. Viewing, reading, listening: Audiences and cultural reception. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17. Dahlgren, P. (1998). Critique: Elusive audiences. In R. Dickinson, R. Harindranath, & R. O. Linné (Eds.), Approaches to audiences (pp. 298-310). London: Arnold.
18. Dean, J. (2002). Publicity's secret. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19. Dean, J. (2004). The networked empire: Communicative capitalism and the hope for politics. In P. Passavant & J. Dean (Eds.), Empire's new clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri (pp. 265-288). New York: Routledge.
20. Dean, M. (1996). Foucault, government, and the enfolding of authority. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 209-230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. De Certeau, M. (1986). Heterologies: Discourses on the other (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. Deleuze, G. (1990a). Control and becoming. In Negotiations (M. Joughin, Trans.; pp. 169-176). New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Deleuze, G. (1990b). Postscript on control societies. In Negotiations (M. Joughin, Trans.; pp. 177-182). New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and struggles in high technology capitalism Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
26. Ewen, S. (1976). Captains of consciousness: Advertising and the social roots of the consumer culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Ewen, S. (1996). PR! A social history of spin. New York: Basic Books.
28. Fiske, J. (1987): Television culture. London: Routledge
29. Fiske, J. (1994). Audiencing: Cultural practice and cultural studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Foucault, M. (1988). The concern for truth. In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Foucault, politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 255-267). New York: Routledge.
31. Foucault, M. (1997a). Polemics, politics, and problematizations. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 111-120). New York: New Press.
32. Foucault, M. (1997b). Preface to the History of sexuality (Vol. 2). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 199-206). New York: New Press.
33. Grossberg, L. (1988). Wandering audiences, nomadic critics. Cultural Studies, 2, 377-391.
34. Grossberg, L., Wartella, E., & Whitney, C. (1998). MediaMaking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Gunning, T. (1988). From the opium den to the theatre of morality: Moral discourse and the film process in early American cinema. Art and Text, 30, 30-40.
36. Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language. London: Hutchinson.
38. Hardt, M. (1991). Translator's foreword: The anatomy of power. In A. Negri, The savage anomaly. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39. Hardt, M., & Dumm, T. (2004). Sovereignty, multitudes, absolute democracy: A discussion between Michael Hardt and Thomas Dumm about Hardt and Negri's Empire. In P. Passavant & J. Dean (Eds.), Empire's new clothes. New York: Routledge.
40. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Hartley, J. (1992). Tele-ology: Studies in television. London: Routledge.
43. Huyssen, A. (1986). After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
44. Jhally, S. (1987). The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society. New York: St. Martin's Press.
45. Klein, N. (2002). No logo. New York: St. Martin's Press.
46. Kline, S., Dyer-Witheford, N., & De Peuter, G. (2003). Digital play: The interaction of technology, culture, and marketing. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
47. Lasswell, H. (1927). Propaganda technique in the world war. London: Kegan Press.
48. Lasswell, H. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. New York: Viking Press.
49. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
50. Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labour. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
51. Lears, J. (1983). From salvation to self-realization: Advertising and the therapeutic roots of the consumer culture, 1880-1930. In R. Fox & J. Lears (Eds.), The culture of consumption: Critical essays in American history, 1880-1980. New York: Pantheon Books.
52. Leiss, W., Kline, S., & Jhally, S. (1997). Social communication in advertising. New York: Routledge.
53. Marchand, R. (1985). Advertising the American dream: Making way for modernity, 1920-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54. Mattelart, A. (1994). Mapping world communication: War progress culture (S. Emanuel & J. Cohen, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
55. Mattelart, A. (1996). The invention of communication (S. Emanuel, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
56. Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (1998). Theories of communication. London: Sage.
57. McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. (2003). Cyberactivism. New York: Routledge.
58. McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Meehan, E. (1990). Why we don't count: The commodity audience. In P. Mellencamp (Ed.), Logics of television (pp. 117-137). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
60. Merton, R. (1946). Mass persuasion: The social psychology of a war bond drive. New York: Harper.
61. Modleski, T. (1986). Femininity as mas(s)querade: A feminist approach to mass culture. In C. MacCabe (Ed.), High theory, low culture (pp. 37-52). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
62. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences, and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
63. Morley, D. (1996). The geography of television: Ethnography, communications, and community. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 317-342). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
64. Negri, A.(1999). Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
65. Petro, P. (1986). Mass culture and the feminine: The "place of television in film studies. Cinema Journal, 25, 5-21.
66. Rabinow, P. (1997). Introduction. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault, ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. xi-xlv). New York: New Press.
67. Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
68. Radway, J. (1988). Reception studies: Ethnography and the problems of dispersed audiences and nomadic critics. Cultural Studies, 2, 359-376.
69. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Ross, S. J. (1999). Working-class Hollywood: Silent film and the shaping of class in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
71. Rushkoff, D. (1996a). Media virus! Hidden agendas in popular culture. New York: Ballantine Books.
72. Rushkoff, D. (1996b). Playing the future: How kids' culture can teach us to thrive in an age of chaos. New York: HarperCollins.
73. Silverstone, R. (1990). Television and everyday life: Towards an anthropology of the television audience. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 173-189). London: Sage.
74. Silverstone, R. (1996). From audiences to consumers: The household and the consumption of communication and information technologies. In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The audience and its landscape (pp. 281-296). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
75. Simpson, C. (1994). Science of coercion: Communication research and psychological warfare 1945-1960. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Smythe, D. (1981). Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Soderlund, G. (2002). Sex panics and city papers in America, 1907-1917: Mass media and public controversy over the traffic in women. Unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois.
78. Stauber, J., & Rampton, S. (1995). Toxic sludge is good for you: Lies, damn lies, and the public relations industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
79. Tronti, M. (1980). The strategy of refusal. In S. Lotringer & C. Marazzi (Eds.), Italy: Autonomia/post-political politics (pp. 36-61). New York: Semiotext(e).
80. Welles, Orson. (1938, October 30). The War of the Worlds. [Radio broadcast]. New York: Columbia Broadcasting System, Mercury Theater.
81. Wertham, F. (1955). Seduction of the innocent. London: Museum Press.
82. Williams, R. (1961). Culture and society. London: Random House.
83. Wombell, P. (1986). Face to face with themselves. In P. Holland, J. Spence, & S. Watney (Eds.), Photograpphy/Politics: Two (pp. 81-84). London: Comedia/Photography Workshop.
84. Zelizer, B. (1992). Covering the body: The Kennedy assassination, the media, and the shaping of collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.