How should creativity be defined?

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 293-295

  Smith, Gudmund J W ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844493133     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1702&3_14     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Brown, J. W. (2002). The self-embodying mind. Barrytown, NJ: Station Hill.
2. Kragh, U., & Smith, G. (Eds.). (1970). Percept-genetic analysis. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
3. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.
4. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2003a). Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
5. Runco, M. A. (2003b). Commentary on personal and potentially ambiguous creativity. You can't understand a butterfly unless you also watch the caterpillar. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 137-141.
6. Simon, H. A. (2001). Creativity in the arts and the sciences. The Canyon Review and Stand, 23, 203-220.
7. Smith, G. J. W. (2001). The process approach to personality. New York: Plenum.
8. Smith, G. J. W., & Carlsson, I. (2001). The creative functioning test. Lund, Sweden: Department of Psychology.