An evaluation of synchronous co-operative distance learning in the field: The importance of instructional design;Une evaluation de l’apprentissage coopératif synchrone sur le champs: L’importance d’un schéma d’instruction;Ein Feldversuch mit kooperativem synchronem E-Learning: Die Bedeuting des Instruktionsdesigns

Educational Media International

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 91-100

  Münzer, Stefan ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844480940     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952398032000092143     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. [Line 3870]Aleven, VA and Koedinger, KR (2002) An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
2. Brennan, SE (1998) The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In Fussel, SR and Kreuz, RS (cds) Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahawah, NJ, pp. 201 225.
3. [Line 3930]Diehl, M and Stroebe, W (1991) Productivity loss in idea generating groups: tracking down the blocking effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 497-509.
4. Eales, RTJ, Hall, T and Bannon, LJ (2002) The motivation is the message: comparing CSGL, in different settings. In Stahl, G (ed.) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO, pp. 62-71.
5. Flagg, BN (1990) Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. [Line 4015]Friedrich, HF. Hron, A and Hesse, FW (2001) A framework for designing and evaluating virtual seminars, European Journal of Education, 37, 2, 157-174.
7. Henri, F (1992) Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye, AR (ed.) Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, Springer, Berlin & New York, pp. 115-136.
8. O'Donnell, AN and Dansereau, DF (1992) Scripted co-operation in student dyads: a method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R and Miller, N (eds) Interactions in co-operative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 120-141.
9. [Line 4112]Pena-Shaff, J, Martin, W and Gay, G (2001) An epÍstemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12, 1, 41-68.
10. [Line 4143]Reid, FJ, Malinek, V, Stott, CJ and Evans, J St (1996) The messaging threshold in computer-mediated communication, Ergonomics, 39, 8, 1017-1037.
11. Stahl, G (2002) Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Stahl, G (ed.) Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO, pp. 62-71.
12. Wessner, M and Pfister, HR (2001) Group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning. In Ellis, S, Rodden, T and Zigurs, I (eds) Proceedings of the ACM Group 2001 Conference, ACM Press. Boulder CO, pp. 24 31.
13. Wessner, M. Pfister, HR and Miao, Y (1999) Using learning protocols to structure computer-supported co-operative learning. In Collis, B and Oliver, R (eds) Proceedings of the ED-MEDLA 1999 -- World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Seattle, WA, pp. 471-476.