Welfare evaluations of nonhuman animals in selected zoos in the Philippines

Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 59-68

  Almazan, Ronnel R ^a   Rubio, Roberto P ^a   Agoramoorthy, Govindasamy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA   (Philippines)

^b TAJEN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CARE; ANIMAL HEALTH; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMAL WELLBEING; ARTICLE; HYGIENE; NONHUMAN; PHILIPPINES; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VETERINARY MEDICINE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION; STANDARD; STATISTICS; ZOO ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, ZOO; PHILIPPINES;

EID: 23844479635     PISSN: 10888705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0801_5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agoramoorthy, G. (2002). Animal welfare and ethics evaluations in Southeast Asian zoos: Procedures and prospects. Animal Welfare, 11, 295-299.
2. Agoramoorthy, G. (2003). Illegal trade of exotic pets. Hemispheres, 3, 36-39.
3. Agoramoorthy, G. (2004). Ethics and welfare in Southeast Asian zoos. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7, 189-195.
4. Agoramoorthy, G., & Harrison, B. (2002). Ethics and animal welfare evaluations in Southeast Asian zoos: A case study of Thailand. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5, 1-13.
5. Agoramoorthy, G., & Hsu, M. J. (2001a). Rehabilitation and rescue center. In C. E. Bell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the world's zoos (pp. 1052, 1053). London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
6. Agoramoorthy, G., & Hsu, M. J. (2001b). South East Asian zoos association. In C. E. Bell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the world's zoos (pp. 1164, 1165). London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
7. American Zoo and Aquarium Association Publication. (1997). AZA's minimum husbandry guidelines for mammals. Bethesda, MD: Author.
8. Coe, J. C. (1985). Design and perception: Making the zoo experience real. Zoo Biology, 4, 197-208.
9. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (1998). IUCN guidelines for re-introduction. Cambridge, England: Author.
10. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (2002). IUCN guidelines for the placement of confiscated animals. Gland, Switzerland: Author.
11. Kreger, M. D. (2001). Hagenbeck, Carl, Jr. 1844-1913. German animal dealer and trainer, founder of Tierpark Hagenbeck. In C. E. Bell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the world's zoos (pp. 535-537). London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
12. Markowitz, H. (1982). Behavioral enrichment in the zoo. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Mench, J. A., & Kreger, M. D. (1996). Ethical and welfare issues associated with keeping wild mammals in captivity. In G. Kleiman, M. E. Allen, K. V. Thompson, & S. Lumpkin (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and technique (pp. 5-15). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Protected Areas & Wildlife Bureau. (2001). Statistics on Philippine protected areas and wildlife resources. Quezon City, Philippines: Author.
15. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. SAS Institute. (2000). SAS/ETS software: Changes and enhancements. Release 8.1 [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
17. Spedding, C. R. W. (1993). Animal welfare policy in Europe. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 6, 110-117.
18. World Society for the Protection of Animals. (2002). Caged cruelty: The detailed findings of an inquiry into animal welfare in Indonesian zoos. London: Author.