Ethics of embryonic stem cell technology: Science versus philosophy [3]

Internal Medicine Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 499-500

  Baschetti, R ^a  

^a Italian State Railways   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CLONING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; OOCYTE; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; SURVIVAL;

BRAZIL; EMBRYO RESEARCH; HUMANS; PHILOSOPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 23844475396     PISSN: 14440903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00885.x     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Cregan K. Ethical and social issues of embryonic stem cell technology. Intern Med J 2005; 35: 126-7.
2. Reed D. Paralysis, Roman Reed, and a ban on stem-cell research. Lancet 2004; 364: 219.
3. Fischbach GD, Fischbach RL. Stem cells: science, policy, and ethics. J Clin Invest 2004; 114: 1364-70.
4. Katz LD. Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic; 2000.
5. Wilson EO. The biological basis of morality. The Atlantic Monthly 1998; 281: 53-70.
6. Baschetti R. Evolutionary morality and public health. Intern Med J 2005; 35: 372.
7. Baschetti R. Evolutionary ethic and embryonic stem-cell research. Intern Med J 2004; 34: 371.
8. Harris J. Cloning and bioethical thinking. Nature 1997; 389: 433.
9. de Waal F. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.