Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court

JAMA

Volumn 294, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 842-844

  Gostin, Lawrence O ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; DIAMORPHINE; LYSERGIDE;

BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COURT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG SAFETY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INOPERABLE CANCER; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTING SYNDROME; ARTICLE; CANNABIS SMOKING; GONZALES V. RAICH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PHYTOTHERAPY; UNITED STATES;

GONZALES V. RAICH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; LEGAL APPROACH;

CANNABIS; DRUG AND NARCOTIC CONTROL; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; MARIJUANA SMOKING; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYTOTHERAPY; STATE GOVERNMENT; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23844460022     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.7.842     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Gonzalez v Raich,125 SCt 2195 (2005).
2. Cal Health & Safety Cod Ann §11362.5(d) (West 2005).
3. Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 21 USC §801 et seq.
4. United States v Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 532 US 483, 490 (2001).
5. 66 Federal Register, 20,038 (2001).
6. Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v DEA,15 F3d 1131, 1133 (DC Cir 1994).
7. Grinspoon v DEA, 828 F2d 881, 883-884 (1st Cir 1987).
8. IsikoffM. Administrative law judge urges medicinal use of marijuana: DEA expected to reject call for limited legalization. Washington Post. September 7, 1988; sect 1:A2.
9. Wickard v Filburn, 317 US 111 (1942).
10. United States v Lopez, 514 US 549 (1995).
11. United States v Morrison, 529 US 598 (2000).
12. Greenhouse L The Rehnquist Court and its imperiled states' rights legacy. New York Times. June 12, 2005;sect 4:3.
13. Madison J. Federalist No. 45. In: Rossiter C, ed. The Federalist Papers. New York, NY: New American Library; 1961:292-293.
14. New State Ice Co v Liebmann, 285 US 262, 311 (1932) ( J. Brandeis, dissenting).
15. Oregon v Ashcroft, 368 F3d 1118 (9th Cir 2004), cert granted sub nom, Gonzalez v Oregon, 125 SCt 1299 (2005).
16. New York v United States, 505 US 144 (1992).
17. University of Alabama v Garrett, 531 US 356 (2001).
18. Oral Argument, US Supreme Court Official Transcript at 50, Gonzalez v Raich, 125 SCt 2195 (2005). No. 03-1454.
19. Institute of Medicine. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
20. Satel S Good to grow. New York Times. June 8, 2005;sect 4:3.
21. Steinbrook R. Medical marijuana, physician-assisted suicide, and the controlled substances act. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1380-1383.
22. Conant v Walters, 309 F3d 629 (9th Cir 2002), cert denied, 540 US 946 (2003).
23. Kassirer JP. Federal foolishness and marijuana. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:366-367.