Integrative complexity in face-to-face negotiations between the Chiapas guerrillas and the Mexican government

Political Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 543-552

  Liht, José ^a   Suedfeld, Peter ^b   Krawczyk, Andi ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Conflict resolution; Indigenous populations; Integrative complexity; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844458694     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00430.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Avendaño, A., & Coutiño, G. (1995, May 16). El gobierno federal y el EZLN establecieron un acuerdo mínimo sobre medidas de distensión que procederán a poner a prueba y convinieron en continuar el dialogo el 7 de junio en esta misma comunidad. El Financiero, p. A1.
2. Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E. J., Bluck, S., de Vries, B., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexify scoring manual. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 401-418). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
4. Calvert, P. (1973). Mexico. New York: Praeger.
5. Conway, L. G. III, Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Integrative complexity and political decisions that lead to war or peace. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 66-75). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Coordinación Para el Diálogo y la Negociatión en Chiapas (2000). Chiapas con justicia y dignidad: Memoria de acuerdos, compromisos, acciones y obras. México: Secretaría de Gobernación.
7. Deutsch, M. (2001). Cooperation and conflict resolution: Implications for consulting psychology. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53, 76-81.
8. nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Preston, J. (2000). Upending the status quo: Cognitive complexity in U.S. Supreme Court justices who overturn legal precedent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1013-1022.
10. Henríquez, E., Olmos, J., & Zúñiga, J. A. (1995, May 16). Nos han escuchado y entendido, dice Tacho. La Jornada, p. A1.
11. Hernández, L., & Vera, R. (1998). Acuerdos de San Andrés. México: Era.
12. Hunsberger, B., Lea, J. Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., & McKenzie, B. (1992). Making life complicated: Prompting the use of integratively complex thinking. Journal of Personality, 60, 95-114.
13. Suedfeld, P. (1992a). Bilateral relations between countries and the complexity of newspaper editorials. Political Psychology, 13, 601-611.
14. Suedfeld, P. (1992b). Cognitive managers and their critics. Political Psychology, 13, 435-453.
15. Suedfeld, P., Guttieri, K., & Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Assessing integrative complexity at a distance: Archival analyses of thinking and decision making. In J. M. Post (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton (pp. 246-270). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Suedfeld, P., Lavallee, L., & Brough, J. (1998). Political language in an environmental controversy: Integrative complexity and motive imagery in advocacy propaganda and the press. In O. Feldman & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.), Politically speaking: A worldwide examination of language used in the public sphere (pp. 170-183). Westport, CT: Praeger.
17. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Integrative complexity of American and Soviet foreign policy rhetoric: A timeseries analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1565-1585.
18. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50, 819-827.
19. Whitmeyer, J. M., & Hopcroft, R. L. (1996). Community, capitalism, and rebellion in Chiapas. Sociological Perspectives, 39, 517-538.