An assessment of strategies for information system evaluation: Lessons for education

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 361-371

  Wild, Phil ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844448737     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89367-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Audit Commission. (1994). High risk/High potential: An executive report on the management of information technology in local government. London: HMSO.
2. Bjorn-Anderson, N. (1984). Management use of new office technology. In H. Otway & M. Peltu (Eds.), The managerial challenge of new office technology, (pp. 99-124). London: Butterworths.
3. Byers, C. R., & Blume, D. (1994). Tying critical success factors to systems development, information and Management, 26(1). 51-61.
4. Crozier, M., & Pavé, F. (1984). Managing the changing organisation. In H. Otway, & M. Peltu (Eds.), The managerial challenge of new office technology (pp. 125-143). London: Butterworths.
5. Diaper, D. (Ed.) (1989) Task analysis for human-computer interaction. Chichester: Elliss Horwood Ltd.
6. Eason, K. D. (1988). Information technology and organisational change. London: Taylor and Francis.
7. Farbey, B., Targett, D., & Land, F. (1992). Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7(2), 109-122.
8. Fischer, G. (1984). Human-Computer Communications and knowledge-based systems. In H. Otway & M. Peltu. (Eds.), The managerial challenge of new office technology, (pp. 54-79) London: Butterworths.
9. Gatian, A. W. (1994). Is user satisfaction a valid measure of systems effectiveness? Information and Management, 26(3), 119-131.
10. Helmriech, R. (1989). How system acceptance boosts office productivity. Siemens Review Special, Hamburg, 25-29.
11. Hirschheim, R., & Smithson, S. (1987). Information systems evaluation: Myth and reality. In G. Galliers (Ed.), Information analysis: Selected readings, (pp. 367-380). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
12. Iivari, J., & Ervasti, I. (1994) User information satisfaction: IS implementability and effectiveness. Information and Management, 27(4), 205-220.
13. Lai, V. S. (1994). A survey of rural small business computer use: Success factors and decision support. Information and Management, 26(6), 297-304.
14. Lee, G., & Gough, T. (1993). An integrated framework for information systems planning and its initial application. Journal of Information Technology, 8, 227-240.
15. Mitchell, S., & Wild, P. (1993). A task analysis of a computerised system to support administration in schools, Educational Management and Administration, 21(1), 53-61.
16. Nahapiet, J. E. (1984). Assessing costs and benefits in system design selection. In H. Otway & M. Peltu (Eds.), The managerial challenge of new office technology (pp. 171-195). London: Butterworths.
17. NCET (1994) IT works: Stimulate to educate. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
18. Novara, F., Bertaggia, N., Allamanno, N., Fox, S., & Olphert, W. (1987). Usability evaluation and feedback to designers - an experimental study. In H. J. Bullinger & B. Shackel (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction - Interact '87 (pp. 337-340). North Holland: Elsevier.
19. Olphert, C. W., & Harker, S. D. P. (1994). The ORDIT method for organisational requirements definition. In G. E. Bradley & H. W. Endrick (Eds.), Human factors in organisational design and management - IV (pp. 421-425). North Holland: Elsevier Science.
20. Otway, H., & Peltu, M. (Eds.) (1984). The managerial challenge of new office technology. London: Butterworths.
21. Peltu, M. (1984). Successful management of office automation. Manchester: National Computing Centre.
22. Plenart, G. (1988). The basis of a successful system. Information and Management, 15, 251-254.
23. Richardson, S. (1987). Operationalising usability and acceptability - a methodological review. In J. R. Wilson., E. N. Corlett & I. Manenica (Eds.), New methods in applied ergonomics (pp. 125-134). London: Taylor & Francis.
24. Richardson, S., & Otway, H. (1985). User acceptance of man-machine systems. Man-Machine Systems, Varse, Italy, 249-254.
25. Scivier, J. (1990). A user acceptability evaluation of a computerised administration system in a local education authorities secondary schools. Unpublished MSc. research dissertation, Loughborough University of Technology.
26. Shackel, B., & Richardson, S. J. (Eds.), (1991). Human factors for informatics usability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Shepherd, A. (1989) Analysis and training in information technology tasks. In D. Diaper (Ed.), Task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 15-55). Chichester: Elliss Horwood Ltd.
28. Visscher, A. J. (1991). School administrative computing: A framework for analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(1), 1-19.
29. Wild, P., Scivier, J. E., & Richardson, S. J. (1992). Evaluating information technology supported local management of schools: The user acceptability audit. Educational Management and Administration, 20(1), 41-48.
30. Wild, P. (1994). The use of task analysis and user acceptability audits in implementing information technology systems in schools. In B. Z. Barta, M. Telem, & T. Gev (Eds.), Information technology in education management (pp. 27-33). London: Chapman and Hall.