Patient participation in the Cochrane Collaboration - Barriers, experience, and concepts in Germany;Patientenbeteiligung in der cochrane collaboration barrieren, erfahrungen und konzepte aus Deutscher sicht

Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 367-371

  Weingart, Olaf ^a,d   Skoetz, Nicole ^a   Lang, Britta ^b   Richter, Bernd ^c   Engert, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochrane Collaboration; Germany; Information science; Patient participation; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CANCER CENTER; CONSUMER; ENDOCRINE DISEASE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LEUKEMIA; LYMPHOMA; METABOLIC DISORDER; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

GERMANY; HEMATOLOGIC NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 23844445493     PISSN: 14317621     EISSN: 16180992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Chalmers I. The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Ann NY Acad Sci 1993;703:156-63.
2. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane effective Practice and Organization of care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465-68.
3. Lockwood S. Involving patients in clinical research. BMJ 1999;319:724-5.
4. Angerhausen S. Evidenz- und Leitlinienbasierte Behandlung, Diskussions-papier, www.nrwpatienten.de, 2003.
5. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 2002;61:213-36.
6. Dierks ML, Schwartz FW. Rollenveränderungen durch New Public Health. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz 2001;44:796-803.
7. Sachverständigenrat für die konzertierte Aktion im Gesundheitswesen. Finanzierung, Nutzerorientierung und Qualität, Gutachten 2003. Bonn 2003.
8. Antes G. Die Evidenz-Basis von klinischen Leitlinien, Health Technology Assessments und Patienteninformation als Grundlage für Entscheidungen in der Medizin. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2004;98:180-4.
9. Ghersi D. Making it happen: approaches to involving consumers in Cochrane Reviews. Eval Health Prof 2002;25:270-83.
10. CC-Net. Consumer roles, Zugriff 10.11.2004: www.cochrane.no/consumers/ Docs.aspx?wflD=4&lid=1&wdlD=8
11. Sakala C, Gyte G, Henderson S, Neilson JP, Horey D. Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: the experience of the Cochrane Collaboration's Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Birth 2001;28:133-7.
12. Kelson MC. Consumer collaboration, patient-defined outcomes and the preparation of Cochrane Reviews. Health Expect 1999;2:129-35.
13. Collaborative Review Groups. About the Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
14. CC-Net. Barriers to consumer participation in the Cochrane review process. Zugriff 10.11.2004: http://www.cochrane.org/consumers/ cinc.htm#forcochrane
15. Weingart O, Skoetz N, Engert A. Is there a need for education in evidence-based medicine for oncology patients? Experiences of the Cochrane Haemtological Malignancies Group. Gemeinsame Jahrestagung der Deutschen, Österreichischen und Schweizerischen Gesellschaften für Hämatologie und Onkologie; 2004 Okt; Innsbruck, Onkologie 2004;27 Suppl 3 159.
16. Bec Hanley, Ann Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ 2001;322:519-23.
17. Triwedi P, Wykes T. From passive subjects to equal partners: Qualitative review of user involvement in research. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181(6):468-72.
18. Bastian H. Consumer refereeing: what are the best ways to do it? The Consumer Network Newsletter 1998;4:9-11.