Correction of errors in a verb modality corpus for machine translation with a machine-learning method

ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 18-37

  Murata, Masaki ^a   Utiyama, Masao ^a   Uchimoto, Kiyotaka ^a   Isahara, Hitoshi ^a   Ma, Qing ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Corpus correction; Machine learning; Machine translation; Modality corpus

Indexed keywords

CORPUS CORRECTION; MACHINE TRANSLATION; MAXIMUM-ENTROPY METHODS; MODALITY CORPUS;

ALGORITHMS; ERROR DETECTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 23844440317     PISSN: 15300226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1066078.1066080     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ABNEY, S., SCHAPIRE, R.E., AND SINGER, Y. 1999. Boosting applied to tagging and PP attachment. EMNLP/VLC-99.
2. CRISTIANINI, N. AND SHAWE-TAYLOR, J. 2000. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press.
3. ESKIN, E. 2000. Detecting errors within a corpus using anomaly detection. NAACL-2000.
4. FUKUNAGA, K. 1972. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. Academic Press.
5. KUME, M., TOYOSHIMA, T., AND NAGATA, M. 1990. Japanese aspect processing for spoken language translation. In Information Processing Society of Japan, the 40th National Convention, 1F-7. 415-416. (In Japanese).
6. MURATA, M., MA, Q., UCHIMOTO, K., AND ISAHARA, H. 1999. An example-based approach to Japanese-to-English translation of tense, aspect, and modality. In TMI '99. 66-76.
7. MURATA, M., UCHIMOTO, K., MA, Q., AND ISAHARA, H. 2001. Using a support-vector machine for Japanese-to-English translation of tense, aspect, and modality. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on the Data-Driven Machine Translation. ACM Press, New York.
8. MURATA, M., MA, Q., AND ISAHARA, H. 2002. Comparison of three machine-learning methods for Thai part-of-speech tagging. ACM Trans. Asian Language Information Processing 1, 2 (2002), 145-158.
9. NAGAO, M. 1984. A framework of a mechanical translation between Japanese and English by analogy principle. Artificial and Human Intelligence. 173-180.
10. PIETRA, S. D., PIETRA, V. D., AND LAFFERTY, J. 1995. Inducing features of random fields. Tech. Rep., CMUCS-95-144. Carnegie Mellon University.
11. RISTAD, E. S. 1997. Maximum entropy modeling for natural language. ACL/EACL Tutorial Program, Madrid.
12. RISTAD, E. S. 1998. Maximum entropy modeling toolkit. Release 1.6 beta. http://www.mnemonic.com/software/memt.
13. RIVEST, R. L. 1987. Learning decision lists. Machine Learning 2 (1987), 229-246.
14. SATO, S. 1993. Example-based translation of technical terms. In TMI-93. 58-68.
15. SHIMIZU, M. AND NARITA, N., eds. 1976. The KODANSHA Japanese-English Dictionary. Kodansha. (In Japanese).
16. SHIRAI, S., YOKOO, A., AND BOND, F. 1990. Generation of tense in newspaper translation. In Proceedings of The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Autumn Convention. D-69. (In Japanese).
17. SUMITA, E. 1992. Example-based transfer of Japanese adnominal particles into English. IEICE Trans Information and Systems (1992), E75-D(4).
18. YAROWSKY, D. 1994. Decision lists for lexical ambiguity resolution: Application to accent restoration in Spanish and French. In Proceedings of the 32rd Annual Meeting of the Association of the Computational Linguistics. 88-95.