A novel opioid maintenance program for prisoners: Report of post-release outcomes

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 433-454

  Kinlock, Timothy W ^a,b   Battjes, Robert J ^a   Schwartz, Robert P ^a,c  

^a FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^c Open Society Institute Baltimore   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug abuse treatment; Heroin; LAAM; Methadone; Prisoners

Indexed keywords

LEVACETYLMETHADOL; OPIATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG USE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPIATE ADDICTION; PILOT STUDY; PRISONER; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BALTIMORE; CRIME; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEROIN DEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; METHADYL ACETATE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NARCOTICS; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PRISONERS; RECURRENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 23744508336     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/ADA-200056804     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Maddux JF, Desmond DP. Careers of opioid users. Praeger Studies on Issues and Research in Substance Abuse. New York: Praeger, 1981.
2. Nurco DN, Hanlon TE, Kinlock TW. Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9:221-242.
3. Chitwood D, Comerford M, Weatherby N. The initiation of the use of heroin in the age of crack. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:51-76.
4. Inciardi JA, McBride D, Surratt H. The heroin street addict: profiling a national population. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:31-50.
5. Weatherburn D, Lind B. Heroin harm minimization: do we really have to choose between law enforcement and treatment? NSW Crime Just Bull 1999; 46:1-11.
6. Chaiken JM, Chaiken MR. Drugs and predatory crime. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, eds. Drugs and Crime (Crime Justice). Vol. 13. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990:203-219.
7. Hanlon TE, Nurco DN, Kinlock TW, Duszynski KR. Trends in criminal activity and drug use over an addiction career. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1990; 16:223-238.
8. Kinlock T, Hanlon T, Nurco D. Heroin use in the United States: history and present developments. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:1-30.
9. Hanlon T, Nurco D, Bateman R, O'Grady K. The response of drug abuser parolees to a combination of treatment and intensive supervision. Prison J 1998; 78:31-44.
10. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Year-End 1999 Emergency Department Data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2000.
11. Hanlon TE, Nurco DN, Bateman R, O'Grady K. The relative effects of three approaches to the parole supervision of narcotic addicts and cocaine abusers. Prison J 1999; 79:163-181.
12. Leukefeld CG, Tims F, Farabee D. Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues. New York: Springer, 2002.
13. Battjes RJ, Carswell S. Federal drug abuse treatment research priorities. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims F, Farabee D, eds. Clinical and Policy Responses to Drug Offenders. New York: Springer, 2002:348-361.
14. Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA, Hooper RM, Harrison LD. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. J Drug Issues 1997; 27:261-278.
15. Pearson FS, Lipton DS. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison J 1999; 79:384-410.
16. Gaes GG, Flanigan TJ, Motiuk LL, Stewart L. Adult correctional treatment. In: Tonry M, Petersilia J, eds. Prisons (Crime Justice). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999; 26:361-426.
17. Petrosino A, Turpin-Petrosino C, Finckenauer JO. Well-meaning programs can have harmful effects! lessons from experiments of programs such as scared straight. Crime Delinq 2000; 46:354-379.
18. Sherman LW. Reducing incarceration rates: the promise of experimental criminology. Crime Delinq 2000; 46:299-314.
19. Field G. Continuity of Offender Treatment for Substance Abuse Disorders from Institution to Community. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1998, Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 30, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 98-3245.
20. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). National Drug Control Policy. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999.
21. Ball JC, Ross A. The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients, Programs, Services, and Outcomes. New York: Springer, 1991.
22. Joseph J, Stancliff T, Langrod J. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): a review of historical and clinical issues. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67:347-364.
23. Platt J, Widman M, Lidz V, Marlowe D. Methadone maintenance treatment: its development and effectiveness after 30 years. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:160-187.
24. Belenko S. Behind bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York: The National Center of Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 1998.
25. Magura S, Rosenblum A, Lewis C, Joseph H. The effectiveness of injail methadone maintenance. J Drug Issues 1993; 23:75-99.
26. Levasseuir L, Marzo JN, Ross N, Blatier C. Frequence des reincarcerations dans une même maison d'arret: Role des traitements de substitution. Ann Med Interne 2002; 153(3):S14-S19.
27. Dole V, Robinson J, Orraga J, Towns E, Searcy P, Caine E. Methadone treatment of randomly selected criminal addicts. N Engl J Med 1969; 280:1372-1375.
28. Tomasino V, Swanson AJ, Nolan J, Shuman M. The key extended entry program (KEEP): a methadone treatment program for opiate-dependent inmates. Mt Sinai J Med 2001; 68:14-20.
29. Gray TA, Wish ED. Substance Abuse and Need for Treatment Among Arrestees (SANTA) in Maryland. College Park, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Research, 1997.
30. Wish ED, Yacoubian GS. Findings from the Baltimore City Substance Abuse Need for Treatment (SANTA) Project, 2001. College Park, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Research, 2001.
31. Kinlock TW, Battjes RJ, Schwartz RP. A novel opioid maintenance program for prisoners: preliminary findings. J Subst Abuse Treatment 2002; 22:141-147.
32. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
33. Ladouceur R, Gosselin P, Laberge M, Blaszczynski A. Dropouts in clinical research: do results reflect clinical reality? Behav Ther 2001 February; 24:44-46.
34. Del Boca FK, Noll JA. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 2000; 95(3):347-360.
35. Junger-Tas J, Marshall IH. The self-report methodology in crime research. In: Tonry M, ed. Crime Justice. Vol. 25. University of Chicago Press, 1999:291-366.
36. Knight K, Holcum M, Simpson DD. TCU Psychosocial Functioning and Motivation Scales: Manual on Psychometric Properties. Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1994.
37. Simpson DD. TCU Forms Manual: Drug Abuse Treatment for AIDS-Risk Reduction (DATAR). Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1992.
38. Simpson DD, Joe GW. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy 1993; 30:357-367.
39. Kinlock TW, O'Grady KE, Hanlon TE. Differentiation of Substance Abuser Inmates on the Basis of Self-Reported Criminality. Paper presented at the 51st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada, November 1999.
40. Nurco DN, Hanlon TE, Kinlock TW, Duszynski KR. The consistency of criminal behavior over preaddiction, addiction, and nonaddiction status periods. Compr Psychiatry 1989; 30:391-402.
41. Hiller ML, Knight K, Simpson D. Risk factors that predict dropout from corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. Prison J 1999; 79:411-430.
42. Nurco DN. A long-term program of research on drug use and crime. Subst Use Misuse 1998; 33:1817-1837.
43. Nurco DN, Kinlock TW, Hanlon TE. The nature and status of drug abuse treatment. Md Med J 1994 January; 43:51-57.
44. Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: Wiley, 1984.
45. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1990.
46. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.
47. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
48. Wish E, Hoffman J, Nemes S. The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at follow-up: comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays. In: Harrison LD, ed. The Validity of Self-Reports: Implications for Survey Research. Vol. 167. NIDA Monograph, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997:200-226.
49. Wish ED, Gropper BA. Drug testing in the criminal justice system. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, eds. Drugs and Crime (Crime Justice). Vol. 13. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990:321-391.
50. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). The National Drug Control Strategy Annual Report. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2001.
51. Senese JD, Kalinich DB. Activities and rehabilitation programs for offenders. In: Stojkovic S, Lovell R, eds. Corrections: an Introduction. 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Anderson, 1997:199-235.
52. Nurco DN, Hanlon TE, Kinlock TW, Duszynski KR. Differential criminal patterns of narcotic addicts over an addiction career. Criminol 1988; 26:407-423.
53. Shaffer JW, Nurco DN, Kinlock TW. A new classification of narcotic addicts based on type and extent of criminal activity. Compr Psychiatry 1984; 25:315-328.
54. Johnson BD, Goldstein P, Preble E, Schmeidler J, Lipton DS, Spunt B, Miller T. Taking care of business: the economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985.