Mathematical model describing gradient focusing methods for trace analytes

Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 77, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 5380-5384

  Ghosal, Sandip ^a   Horek, Jon ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; DISPERSIONS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROOSMOSIS; ELECTROPHORESIS; GRAPHIC METHODS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LUBRICATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; VISCOSITY;

Ζ-POTENTIAL; ELECTROOSMOTIC FLOW (EOF); ELECTROPHORETIC VELOCITY; TRACE ANALYTES;

TRACE ANALYSIS;

BUFFER;

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; ELECTROOSMOSIS; ELECTROPHORESIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LUBRICATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; STEADY STATE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 23744508334     PISSN: 00032700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ac050515e     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jorgenson, J., Phillips, M., Eds. New Directions in Electrophoretic Methods; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1987.
2. Chien. R. L. Electrophoresis 2003, 24 (3), 486-497.
3. Ross, D.; Locascio, L. E. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74 (11), 2556-2564.
4. Greenlee, R. D.; Ivory, C. F. Biotechnol. Prog, 1998, 14 (2), 300-309.
5. Koegler, W. S.; Ivory, C. F. J. Chromatogr., A 1996, 726 (1-2), 229-236.
6. Balss, K. M., et al. Micellar affinity gradient focusing: A new method for electrokinetic focusing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (7), 1936-1937.
7. Probstein, R. F. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics An Introduction, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1994.
8. Mikkers, F. E. P.; et al. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 169, 1-10.
9. Batchelor, G. K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1967.
10. Ghosal, S. J. Fluid Mech. 2002, 459, 103-128.
11. Anderson, J. L.; Idol, W. K. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1985, 38 (3), 93-106.
12. Ghosal, S. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 491, 285-300.
13. Aris, R. Proc. R. Soc. London, A 1956, 235 (1200), 67-77.