Communication in Auditors' Reports: Variations in Readability and the Effect of Audit Firm Structure

Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 179-197

  Hay, David ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744505066     PISSN: 10293574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10293574.1998.10510540     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Accounting Association. 1973. A Statement of Basic Auditing Concepts, by the Committee on Basic Auditing Concepts (Sarasota: AAA).
2. Bailey, W. T. 1982. “ An Appraisal of Research Designs Used to Investigate the Information Content of Audit Reports ”. In Accounting Review Vol. LVII, 141–146.
3. Bamber, E. M., Bamber, L. S. and Schoderbek, M. 1993. Audit Structure and Other Determinants of Audit Report Lag: An Empirical Analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12: 1–23.
4. Bamber, E. M. and Snowball, D. 1988. An Experimental Study of the Effects of Audit Structure in Uncertain Task Environments. Accounting Review, 63: 490–504.
5. Barnett, A. and Leoffler, K. 1979. Readability of Accounting and Auditing Messages. Journal of Business Communication, 16: 49–59.
6. Butterworth, P., Gray, R. H. and Haslam, J. 1989. The Local Authority Annual Report in the UK: An Exploratory Study of Accounting Communication and Democracy. Financial Accountability and Management, 5: 73–87.
7. Carmichael, D. R. and Winters, A. J. 1982. “ The Evolution of Audit Reporting ”. In Proceedings of the 1982 Touche Ross University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas.
8. Courtis, J. 1995. Readability of Annual Reports: Western versus Asian Evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8: 4–17.
9. Courtis, J. 1986. An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk-Return Relationships. Accounting and Business Research, 16: 285–294.
10. Cushing, B. E. and Loebbecke, A. J. 1986. Comparison of Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association.
11. Dillard, J. F. and Jensen, D. L. 1983. The Auditor's Report: An Analysis of Opinion. Accounting Review, 58: 787–798.
12. Dolphin, R. and Wagley, R. 1977. “ Reading the Annual Report ”. In Financial Executive 20–22. June
13. Estes, R. 1982. The Auditor's Report and Investor Behavior Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
14. Estes, R. and Reimer, M. 1977. A Study of the Effect of Qualified Auditors' Reports on Bankers' Lending Decisions. Accounting and Business Research, 7: 250–259.
15. Estes, R. and Reimer, M. 1979. An Experimental Study of the Differential Effect of Standard and Qualified Auditors' Opinions on Investors' Price Decisions. Accounting and Business Research, 9: 157–162.
16. Firth, M. 1978. Qualified Audit Reports: Their Impact on Investment Decisions. Accounting Review, 53: 642–650.
17. Flesch, R. 1948. A New Readability Yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32: 221–233.
18. Gul, F. A. 1987. The Effects of Uncertainty Reporting on Lending Officers' Perceptions of Risk and Additional Information Required. Abacus, 23: 172–181.
19. Gul, F. A. 1990. Qualified Audit Reports, Field Dependence Cognitive Style, and Their Effects on Decision Making. Accounting and Finance, 30: 15–28.
20. Gwilliam, D. 1987. A Survey of Auditing Research London: Prentice-Hall.
21. Hatherley, D., Innes, J. and Brown, T. 1991. The Expanded Audit Report—An Empirical Investigation. Accounting and Business Research, 21: 311–319.
22. Healy, P. 1977. Can You Understand the Footnotes to Financial Statements?. Accountants Journal, 56: 219–222.
23. Hille, O. 1993. Expanding the New Zealand Audit Report. Accountants' Journal, 72: 59–61.
24. Holt, G. and Moizer, P. 1990. The Meaning of Audit Reports. Accounting and Business Research, 20: 111–121.
25. Johnson, E. N., Walker, K. B. and Westergaard, E. 1995. Supplier Concentration and Pricing of Audit Services in New Zealand. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14: 74–89.
26. Jones, M. J. 1988. A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman's Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company. Accounting and Business Research, 18: 297–305.
27. Jones, M. J. and Karbhari, Y. 1996. Auditors' Reports: A Six Country Comparison. Advances in International Accounting, 9: 129–155.
28. Jones, M. J. and Shoemaker, P. A. 1994. Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13: 142–184.
29. Kaplan, S. E., Menon, K. and Williams, D. D. 1990. The Effect of Audit Structure on the Audit Market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9: 197–215.
30. Kinney, W. R. 1986. Audit Technology and Preferences for Auditing Standards. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8: 73–89.
31. Lewis, N. R., Parker, L. D., Pound, G. D. and Sutcliffe, P. 1986. Accounting Report Readability: The Use of Readability Techniques. Accounting and Business Research, 16: 199–213.
32. Libby, R. 1979a. Bankers' and Auditors' Perceptions of the Message Communicated by the Audit Report. Journal of Accounting Research, 17: 99–122.
33. Libby, R. 1979b. The Impact of Uncertainty Reporting on the Loan Decision. Journal of Accounting Research, 17: 35–71. supplement
34. Miller, J., Reed, S. and Strawser, R. 1990. “ The New Auditor's Report: Will it Close the Expectations Gap in Communications? ”. In The CPA Journal 68–72. May
35. Morris, M. H. and Nichols, W. D. 1988. Consistency Exceptions: Materiality Judgments and Audit Firm Structure. Accounting Review, 58: 237–254.
36. Mutchler, J. F. and Williams, D. D. 1990. The Relationship Between Audit Technology, Client Risk Profiles, and the Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9: 39–54.
37. National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. 1987. Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (The Treadway Report) Washington
38. Neale, A. 1987. Audit: Inconsistently Unqualified. Accountants' Journal, 66: 67–69. 10
39. Newton, J. D. and Ashton, R. H. 1989. The Association Between Audit Technology and Audit Delay. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 8: 22–37. Supplement
40. New Zealand Society of Accountants. 1994. Explanatory Foreword to Professional Engagement Standards and Guidelines Wellington: NZSA).
41. New Zealand Society of Accountants. 1986a. Auditing Standards and Explanatory Notes Wellington: NZSA).
42. New Zealand Society of Accountants. 1986b. Auditing Guideline No 2: The Audit Report Wellington: NZSA).
43. Pashalian, S. and Crissy, W. 1950. How Readable are Corporate Annual Reports?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34: 244–248.
44. Pound, G. 1981. A Note on Audit Report Readability. Accounting and Finance, 21: 45–55.
45. Schroeder, N. and Gibson, C. 1990. Readability of Management's Discussion and Analysis. Accounting Horizons, 4: 80–87.
46. Seidler, L. 1976. Proceedings of the 1976 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems 32–44. Symbolism and Communication in the Auditor's Report
47. Smith, J. E. and Smith, N. P. 1971. Readability: A Measure of the Performance of the Communication Function of Financial Reporting. Accounting Review, 46: 552–561.
48. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. 1992a. The Chairman's Statement and Corporate Financial Performance. Accounting and Finance, 32: 75–90.
49. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. 1992b. Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 5: 84–98.
50. Soper, F. J. and Dolphin, R. 1964. Readability and Corporate Annual Reports. Accounting Review, 39: 358–362.
51. Still, M. D. 1972. The Readability of Chairmen's Statements. Accounting and Business Research, 3: 36–39.
52. Subramaniam, R., Insley, R. G. and Blackwell, R. D. 1993. Performance and Readability: A Comparison of Annual Reports of Profitable and Unprofitable Corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30: 49–61.
53. Tower, G. and Bauer, L. 1991. “ An Empirical Study of Communication in New Zealand Audit Reports: Contrasting the Public and Private Sectors ”. In Annual Conference Proceedings Brisbane: Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand).
54. Trout, J. and Wells, M. C. 1985. Who Audits Australia and New Zealand Sydney: University of Sydney Accounting Research Centre.
55. Tweedie, D. 1985. The Accountant: A Crusader or a Prisoner of the Past New Zealand Society of Accountants 75th Anniversary Research Lecture Wellington: New Zealand Society of Accountants.