Spatial behavior of medium and long-distance migrants at stopovers studied by radio tracking

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1046, Issue , 2005, Pages 242-252

  Chernetsov, Nikita ^a  

^a Zoological Institute   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Movements; Radio tracking; Spatial behavior; Stopover

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; AUTUMN; BIRD; CONFERENCE PAPER; FORAGING; HABITAT USE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION MIGRATION; WEATHER;

ACROCEPHALUS SCHOENOBAENUS; ERITHACUS RUBECULA; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 23744504436     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1343.021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. LINDSTRÖM, Å. 2003. Fuel deposition rates in migrating birds: causes, constraints and consequences. In Avian Migration. P. Berthold, E. Gwinner & E. Sonnenschein, Eds.: 307-320. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
2. KODRIC-BROWN, A. & J.H. BROWN. 1978. Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality in migrant hummingbirds. Ecology 49: 285-296.
3. BIBBY, C.J. & R.E. GREEN. 1980. Foraging behaviour of migrant pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, on temporary territories. J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 507-521.
4. BIBBY, C.J. & R.E. GREEN. 1981. Autumn migration strategies of reed and sedge warblers. Ornis. Scand. 12: 1-12.
5. JOHNSTONE, I. 1998. Territory structure of the robin Erithacus rubecula outside the breeding season. Ibis 140: 244-251.
6. TITOV, N. 1999. Individual home ranges of robins Erithacus rubecula at stopovers during autumn migration. Vogelwelt 120: 237-242.
7. TITOV, N. 1999. Home ranges in two passerine nocturnal migrants at a stopover site in autumn. Avian Ecol. Behav. 3: 69-78.
8. CHERNETSOV, N. & N. TITOV. 2001. Movement patterns of European reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus and sedge warblers A. schoenobaenus before and during autumn migration. Ardea 89: 509-515.
9. CHERNETSOV, N. 2002. Spatial behaviour of first-year blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla) during the pre-migratory period and during autumn migratory stopovers. J. Ornithol. 143: 424-429.
10. CHERNETSOV, N. & C.V. BOLSHAKOV. Spatial behavior of some nocturnal passerine migrants during stopovers. Acta Zool. Sin. In press.
11. TITOV, N. 2000. Interaction between foraging strategy and autumn migratory strategy in the robin Erithacus rubecula. Avian Ecol. Behav. 5: 35-44.
12. CHERNETSOV, N.S. & N.V. TITOV. 2003. Foraging and spring migratory strategy of the robin Erithacus rubecula (Aves, Turdidae) in the southeastern Baltic Sea region. Zool. Zhurn. 82: 1525-1529.
13. CHERNETSOV N. & A. MANUKYAN. 2000. Foraging strategy of the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus) on migration. Vogelwarte 40: 189-197.
14. TITOV, N.V. & N.S. CHERNETSOV. 1999. Stochastic models as a new method for estimating length of migratory stopovers in birds (in Russian). Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 119: 396-403.
15. CHERNETSOV, N. & N. TITOV. 2000. Design of a trapping station for studying migratory stopovers by capture-mark-recapture analysis. Avian Ecol. Behav. 5: 27-33.
16. CACCAMISE, D.F. & R.F. HEDIN. 1985. An aerodynamic basis for selecting transmitter loads in birds. Wilson Bull. 97: 306-318.
17. NAEF-DAENZER, B. 1993. A new transmitter for small animals and enhanced methods of home range analysis. J. Wildl. Manag. 57: 680-689.
18. WILLIAMSON, P. & L. GRAY. 1975. Foraging behavior of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) in Maryland. Condor 77: 84-89.
19. HOOOE, P.N. & B. EICHENLAUB. 2000. Animal movement extension to Arcview. Version 2.0. Alaska Science Center-Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey. Anchorage, AK.
20. ORMEROD, S.J. 1990. Time of passage, habitat use and mass change of Acrocephalus warblers in a South Wales reedswamp. Ringing Migr. 11: 1-11.
21. CHERNETSOV, N. 1998. Post-breeding and post-fledging movements in the reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and sedge warbler (A. schoenobaenus) depend on food abundance. Ornis Svecica 8: 77-82.
22. CHERNETSOV, N. 1999. Migration strategies of Acrocephalus warblers within Europe (in Russian). Ph.D. thesis. Zoological Institute. St. Petersburg.
23. MOORE, F.R. & D.A. ABORN. 2000. Mechanisms of en route habitat selection: how do migrants make habitat decisions during stopover? Stud. Avian Biol. 20: 34-42.
24. WEBER, T.P. & A.I. HOUSTON. 1997. Flight costs, flight range and stopover ecology of migrating birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 297-306.
25. HOUSTON, A.I. 1998. Models of optimal avian migration: state, time and predation. J. Avian Biol. 29: 395-404.
26. CHERNETSOV, N. et al. 2004. Optimal stopover decisions of migrating birds under variable stopover quality: model predictions and the field data. Zh. Obsch. Biol. 65: 211-217.
27. LAJDA, M. 2001. Telemetrische Untersuchung zum Rastverhalten des Rotkehlchens (Erithacus rubecula) in Südwestdeutschland während des Herbstzuges. Diploma thesis. University of Zürich. Zürich.
28. LUNDBERG, A. & R. ALATALO. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. T & AD Poyser. London.
29. SOKOLOV, L. et al. 2004. Spatial distribution of breeding pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in respect to their natal sites. Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 27.1: 355-356.
30. SOKOLOV, L.V. 2000. Spring ambient temperature as an important factor controlling timing of arrival, breeding, post-fledging dispersal and breeding success of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in Eastern Baltic. Avian Ecol. Behav. 5: 79-104.
31. ALATALO, R. & R. ALATALO. 1979. Resource partitioning among a flycatcher guild in Finland. Oikos 33: 46-54.
32. DIERSCHKE, V. 2003. Predation hazard during migratory stopover: are light or heavy birds under risk? J. Avian Biol. 34: 24-29.
33. LANK, D. & R. YDENBERG. 2003. Death and danger at migratory stopovers: problems with "predation risk". J. Avian Biol. 34: 225-228.